...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Drugs >Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: Review and Treatment Recommendations
【24h】

Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: Review and Treatment Recommendations

机译:异位性皮炎的局部钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂:审查和治疗建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease commonly affecting children and managed by pediatricians, primary care physicians, allergists, and dermatologists alike. For many years, the only available topical pharmacological treatment was topical corticosteroids. This changed in 2000–2001, when topical formulations of two calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus) were approved for short-term or chronic intermittent treatment of AD in patients ≥2years of age, in whom other treatments have been ineffective or contraindicated. These topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) quickly became a popular treatment option due at least in part to concerns over adverse events associated with prolonged topical corticosteroid use, especially in children. However, based on theoretical concerns about a possible risk of lymphoma associated with TCI use, a Boxed Warning was placed on both products in 2006. Since then, despite an extensive body of evidence, no causal relationship has been demonstrated between TCI use and an increased risk of lymphoma; however, the US FDA has concluded that a link cannot be ruled out. In fact, based on post-marketing surveillance of spontaneous, literature, and solicited reports, we report here that the lymphoma incidence in the topical pimecrolimus-exposed population is up to approximately 54-fold less than that seen in the general US population. This review summarizes the mechanism of action of TCIs, the factors that prompted the Boxed Warning, and recent TCI safety and efficacy data. Based on these data, both topical corticosteroids and TCIs should have defined roles in AD management, with TCIs favored for sensitive skin areas (e.g., face) and instances where topical corticosteroids have proven ineffective, thereby minimizing the risk of adverse effects with both drug classes.
机译:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种炎症性皮肤病,通常会影响儿童,并由儿科医生,初级保健医生,过敏症医生和皮肤科医生共同控制。多年来,唯一可用的局部药物治疗是局部皮质类固醇激素。这种情况在2000-2001年发生了变化,当时批准了两种钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(他克莫司和吡美莫司)的局部制剂用于≥2岁患者的短期或慢性间歇性AD治疗,而其他治疗均无效或禁忌。这些局部钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(TCIs)迅速成为一种流行的治疗选择,至少部分原因是担心长时间与局部使用皮质类固醇激素有关的不良事件,尤其是在儿童中。但是,基于对与TCI使用相关的淋巴瘤可能风险的理论关注,2006年在这两种产品上都使用了黑框警告。此后,尽管有大量证据表明,在TCI使用与增加TCI之间没有因果关系淋巴瘤的风险;但是,美国FDA得出结论,不能排除这种联系。实际上,基于对自发,文献和征集报告的售后监测,我们在此报告,局部吡美莫司暴露人群的淋巴瘤发生率比美国普通人群低约54倍。这篇综述总结了TCI的作用机理,提示“警告框”的因素以及最近的TCI安全性和有效性数据。根据这些数据,局部皮质类固醇和TCI在AD管理中都应有明确的作用,TCI尤其适用于敏感的皮肤区域(例如面部)以及局部皮质类固醇被证明无效的情况,从而将两种药物的不良反应风险最小化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pediatric Drugs 》 |2013年第4期| 303-310| 共8页
  • 作者

    Warner W. Carr;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号