首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Cardiology >Measuring Stress Velocity Index Using Mean Blood Pressure: Simple yet Accurate?
【24h】

Measuring Stress Velocity Index Using Mean Blood Pressure: Simple yet Accurate?

机译:使用平均血压测量应力速度指数:简单但准确吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The stress velocity index, or the relationship of the rate-corrected mean velocity of circumferential shortening (VCFc) to the end systolic wall stress (ESWS), is a sensitive, load-independent measure of left ventricular contractility. ESWS is technically difficult to obtain and requires simultaneous blood pressure measurement, carotid artery tracing, and phonocardiogram. We report our comparison of two simpler methods of measuring ESWS and, therefore, stress velocity index. Patients with normal cardiac anatomy who had completed anthracycline chemotherapy were evaluated. ESWS as measured by the standard method using a carotid artery tracing (ESWScar) was compared to ESWS obtained using mean arterial pressure (ESWSmap) or systolic blood pressure (ESWSsbp). The cohort included 63 patients, with 37 (59%) males and a median age of 13.1 years. The mean (±SD) ESWScar was 53.3±15.3 g/cm2 (range, 26.3–94 g/cm2); ESWSmap, 53 ±13.4 g/cm2 (range, 27.1–86.1 g/cm2); and ESWSsbp, 72.9 ± 18.2 g/cm2 (range, 40.8–117.2 g/cm2). ESWSmap and ESWSsbp closely correlated with ESWScar (coefficient correlation r = 0.88 and r = 0.87, respectively). Using ESWSmap, all patients were correctly classified as having normal or abnormal contractility as defined by stress velocity index, whereas ESWSsbp detected only two of the six patients with impaired contractility. We conclude that ESWSmap is a simple, highly sensitive and specific method for assessing left ventricular contractility. ESWSmap correlates closely with ESWScar and can be incorporated into the monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in the anthracycline-treated population. Further studies are needed to determine if this simplified measure accurately assesses the ESWS in other cardiac disease states.
机译:应力速度指数,或经校正的圆周缩短的平均速度(VCFc)与收缩末期壁应力(ESWS)的关系,是左心室收缩力的敏感,独立于负荷的测量。 ESWS在技术上很难获得,需要同时进行血压测量,颈动脉描记和心电图检查。我们报告了两种比较简单的ESWS测量方法的比较,因此,比较了应力速度指数。对完成了蒽环类化疗的心脏解剖正常的患者进行评估。将通过标准方法使用颈动脉描记法(ESWScar)测量的ESWS与使用平均动脉压(ESWSmap)或收缩压(ESWSsbp)获得的ESWS进行比较。该队列包括63名患者,其中37名男性(59%)为男性,中位年龄为13.1岁。 ESWScar平均(±SD)为53.3±15.3 g / cm 2 (范围26.3–94 g / cm 2 ); ESWSmap,53±13.4 g / cm 2 (范围27.1–86.1 g / cm 2 );和ESWSsbp,为72.9±18.2 g / cm 2 (范围为40.8–117.2 g / cm 2 )。 ESWSmap和ESWSsbp与ESWScar密切相关(系数相关性分别为r = 0.88和r = 0.87)。使用ESWSmap,根据压力速度指数将所有患者正确分类为收缩力正常或异常,而ESWSsbp仅检测到6位收缩力受损的患者中的2位。我们得出结论,ESWSmap是一种评估左心室收缩力的简单,高度灵敏和特定的方法。 ESWSmap与ESWScar密切相关,可以纳入蒽环类药物治疗人群的心脏功能障碍监测中。需要进行进一步的研究以确定这种简化措施是否可以准确评估其他心脏病状态下的ESWS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号