首页> 外文期刊>Parliamentary Affairs >When Does the Personal Vote Matter for Party Loyalty? The Conditional Effects of Candidate-Centred Electoral Systems
【24h】

When Does the Personal Vote Matter for Party Loyalty? The Conditional Effects of Candidate-Centred Electoral Systems

机译:派对忠诚的个人投票何时? 以候选人为中心的选举系统的条件效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When do candidate-centred electoral systems produce undisciplined parties? In this article, we examine party discipline under open-list proportional representation, a system associated with MPs cultivating personal constituencies. We present a model explaining how legislators' preferences and support among voters mediate political leaders' ability to enforce discipline. We show that disloyalty in candidate-centred systems depends on parties' costs for enforcing discipline, but only conditional on MP preferences. MPs who share the policy preferences of their leaders will be loyal even when the leaders cannot discipline them. To test the model's implications, we use data on legislative voting in Poland's parliament. Our empirical findings confirm that disloyalty is conditioned on party leaders' enforcement capacity and MP preferences. We find that legislators who contribute more to the party electorally in terms of votes are more disloyal, but only if their preferences diverge from the leadership. Our results suggest that the relationship between open lists and party disloyalty is conditional on the context of the party system.
机译:候选人何时何时生产未纪律的缔约方?在本文中,我们根据开放名单比例代表审视党纪律,该系统与培养个人选区的国会议员有关。我们提出了一个模型,解释了立法者偏好和投票之间的支持如何调解政治领导者执行纪律的能力。我们表明,候选人中心系统的不忠依赖于缔约方对执行纪律的成本,而是仅对MP偏好进行有条件。即使在领导人不能训练他们的时候,分享其领导者政策偏好的MPS也会忠诚。为了测试模型的影响,我们将在波兰议会中使用关于立法投票的数据。我们的实证调查结果证实,对党领导人的执法能力和MP偏好有责任。我们发现,在投票方面,专门贡献更多的立法者更不忠诚,但只有他们的偏好从领导力分歧。我们的结果表明,公开清单与一方的关系是关于党系统背景下的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号