首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Review of Education >Derrida, teaching and the context of failure
【24h】

Derrida, teaching and the context of failure

机译:德里达,教学与失败的背景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this paper is to bring critical attention to the ways in which notions of ‘success’ and ‘failure’ are applied to teaching and learning in schools in England and Wales. The main philosophical text that guides the discussion is Derrida’s ‘Signature event context’, which contains a reading of J.L. Austin’s theory of the performative utterance. Derrida finds much to admire in Austin’s philosophising. However, he argues that Austin’s treatment of context misses something important about how things are done with words. Derrida maintains that, having shown how truth claims are bound up with performative concerns, Austin takes a step backwards by fixating on external contextual factors that must be in place for the performative utterance to be happy—for it to ‘succeed’ in doing what the speaker intends it to do. This ignores the iterability of language and the ways in which words are ultimately bound neither by the intentions of the speaker, nor by any other aspect of the environment in which the utterance takes place. The current thinking in regards to successful teaching and learning invites a comparison with Austin’s treatment of context—for a lesson to be successful, a set of contextual factors must be put in place. In this paper, I argue that treating teaching and learning in these terms represents an overdetermined understanding of ‘success’ and ‘failure’ that sees language as something to be tamed by context. Once we recognise that words cannot always or necessarily be brought under control then this will open the door to creative ways of thinking about teaching and language.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.564848
机译:本文的目的是引起人们对“成功”和“失败”概念在英格兰和威尔士学校教学中应用的方式的关注。指导讨论的主要哲学文本是德里达的“签名事件上下文”,其中包含对J.L.奥斯丁的表现话语理论的解读。德里达(Derrida)在奥斯汀的哲学研究中大为赞赏。但是,他认为,奥斯丁对上下文的处理缺少有关单词如何处理的重要内容。德里达坚持认为,奥斯丁展示了真理主张如何与表演关注联系在一起后,通过固定外部语境因素来向后退,为了使表演言语变得“成功”,这些外部因素必须存在,以使其“成功”。做演讲者打算做的事情。这忽略了语言的可迭代性以及单词最终不受讲话者意图或发声环境的任何其他方面的束缚的方式。当前关于成功教与学的思想要求与奥斯汀对情境的处理进行比较,以使一堂课取得成功,必须设置一系列情境因素。在本文中,我认为用这些术语来对待教与学代表了对“成功”和“失败”的过度确定的理解,这种理解将语言视为被上下文所驯服的东西。一旦我们认识到不能总是或不一定要控制单词,便会为创造性的思考教学和语言的方式打开大门。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.564848

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Review of Education》 |2011年第3期|p.403-419|共17页
  • 作者

    Ian Mundaya*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:09:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号