首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Economic Papers >Monitoring subcontracting in a suppliers' hierarchy
【24h】

Monitoring subcontracting in a suppliers' hierarchy

机译:监视供应商层次结构中的分包

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Consider the following contractual hierarchy: a principal who contracts with a contractor below her who then contracts with a subcontractor. The principal requires goods made from both firms in equal proportions. The question we study is whether, at zero cost, the principal would wish to monitor the contract between the subcontractor and contractor. Without monitoring the contractor will determine the type of the subcontractor. Hence, when contracting with the principal he can extract an information rent on this knowledge. Monitoring would reveal the subcontractor type and so lower the principal's bill. However, if the principal monitors the contract between contractor and subcontractor then he may prefer to not screen the subcontractor. So, the contractor must be offered an incentive to screen below. The paper shows that the second of these costs is smaller for a range of parameter values, so that monitoring and incentivizing screening is cheaper than not monitoring.
机译:考虑以下合同层次结构:委托人与位于其下方的承包商签约,然后与分包商签约。委托人要求两家公司以相等的比例制造商品。我们研究的问题是,委托人是否希望以零成本监督分包商与承包商之间的合同。在不监督的情况下,承包商将确定分包商的类型。因此,当与校长签约时,他可以从该知识中提取信息租金。监视将揭示分包商的类型,从而降低委托人的费用。但是,如果委托人监视承包商与分包商之间的合同,则他可能更愿意不筛选分包商。因此,必须鼓励承包商在下面进行筛选。本文显示,对于一定范围的参数值,这些费用中的第二个费用较小,因此监视和激励筛选比不监视便宜。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Economic Papers》 |2011年第3期|p.523-548|共26页
  • 作者

    Michela Cella;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号