首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >Queering Queer Theory in Management and Organization Studies: Notes toward queering heterosexuality
【24h】

Queering Queer Theory in Management and Organization Studies: Notes toward queering heterosexuality

机译:管理和组织研究中的酷儿理论:对异性恋者的注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article suggests new possibilities for queer theory in management and organization studies. Management and organization studies has tended to use queer theory as a conceptual resource for studying the workplace experience of 'minorities' such as gay men, lesbians and those identifying as bisexual or transgender, often focusing on how heteronormativity shapes the discursive constitution of sexualities and genders coded as such. This deployment is crucial and apposite but it can limit the analytical reach of queer theory, neglecting other objects of analysis like heterosexuality. Potentially, MOS queer theory scholarship could be vulnerable to criticism about overlooking queer theory as a productive site for acknowledging both heterosexuality's coercive aspects and its non-normative forms. The principal contribution of our article is therefore twofold. First, it proposes a queering of queer theory in management and organization studies, whereby scholars are alert to and question the potential normativities that such research can produce, opening up a space for exploring how heterosexuality can be queered. Second, we show how queering heterosexuality can be another site where queer theory and politics come together in the management and organization studies field, through a shared attempt to undermine sexual and gender binaries and challenge normative social relations. The article concludes by outlining the political implications of queering heterosexuality for generating modes of organizing in which heterosexuality can be experienced as non-normative and how this might rupture and dismantle heteronormativity.
机译:本文为管理和组织研究中的同志理论提供了新的可能性。管理和组织研究趋向于使用酷儿理论作为研究“少数群体”(如男同性恋者,女同性恋者和那些被认定为双性恋或变性者)的工作场所经验的概念性资源,通常着眼于异规范性如何塑造性和性别的话语构成这样编码。这种部署是至关重要且适当的,但它可能会限制酷儿理论的分析范围,而忽略其他分析对象,例如异性恋。 MOS酷儿理论的学术研究很可能容易受到批评,因为忽略酷儿理论是承认异性恋的强制性方面和非规范性形式的产物。因此,本文的主要贡献是双重的。首先,它提出了对管理和组织研究中的同志理论的质疑,由此学者们警惕并质疑这种研究可能产生的潜在规范性,从而为探索如何质疑异性恋开辟了空间。其次,通过共同尝试破坏性和性别双元并挑战规范的社会关系,我们展示了酷儿异性如何成为酷儿理论和政治在管理和组织研究领域融合在一起的另一个场所。文章最后总结了酷爱异性恋对于产生组织形式的政治含义,在这种组织形式中,异性恋可以被视为非规范性的,以及这将如何破裂和消除异规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号