...
首页> 外文期刊>Open house international >REDEFINING VERNACULAR: THE LEBANESE DIASPORA ECLECTICISM
【24h】

REDEFINING VERNACULAR: THE LEBANESE DIASPORA ECLECTICISM

机译:重新定义车辆:勒索斯散布主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unlike postwar reconstruction of urban districts, the architectural projects developed during the Lebanese war are a relatively unexplored subject, moreover if one is dealing within housing in the rural realm. Uttle attention has been paid to its contemporary propositions, especially to the ones directed by the Lebanese Diaspora during the war. By living abroad and by maintaining a link to their origins, members of the Diaspora put together all their strength and wealth to keep in touch with their land. For a large part, the idea of dwelling refers to their identity: by investing and building houses in their native village, they aim at preserving a place in their community. In this article, the Lebanese Diaspora will be regarded as an ethnoscape, figure of the globalization introduced by Arjun Appadurai, namely a social and political matrix structured by and for the production of a cultural model and identity. Our hypothesis postulates that each village constitutes a micro ethnoscape (with, of course, exceptions and alternatives) and uses a particular architectural language. However, it is not a question of homogenizing all constructions but rather to find a common vocabulary referring to identity and appropriation in the various villages of origin of the Diaspora. The houses built on the native soil by emigrants' take port in the debates that oppose the local production to the global one. Thus, contrary to many researches that denounce globalization for the cultural standardization that it produces, this article intends to show the imaginative character of the members of the Diaspora, their resistance to the traditional models and the contemporary interbreeding which results from it. In this sense, the local and the global are intrinsically related one to the other.
机译:与战后的市区重建不同,黎巴嫩战争期间开发的建筑项目是一个相对未开发的主题,此外,如果涉及农村地区的房屋交易。它的当代主张,尤其是战争期间黎巴嫩侨民所指导的主张,已引起人们的极大关注。通过居住在国外并与他们的血统保持联系,散居国外的人们聚集了自己的全部力量和财富与自己的土地保持联系。在很大程度上,居住的想法指的是他们的身份:通过在他们的故乡投资并建造房屋,他们旨在保留自己社区中的位置。在本文中,黎巴嫩侨民将被视为一种民族风貌,这是阿琼·阿帕杜赖(Arjun Appadurai)提出的全球化人物,即由文化模型和身份构成并为产生文化模型和身份而构建的社会和政治矩阵。我们的假设假设每个村庄构成一个微观的民族景观(当然还有例外和选择),并使用特定的建筑语言。然而,这不是使所有结构同质化的问题,而是在散居海外的各个村庄中找到一个涉及身份和挪用的通用词汇。在与当地生产向全球生产相反的辩论中,移民在当地土壤上建造的房屋成为港口。因此,与许多谴责全球化所产生的文化标准化的研究相反,本文旨在展示散居侨民成员的想象力特征,他们对传统模式的抵制以及由此产生的现代杂交。从这个意义上说,本地和全局在本质上是彼此相关的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号