Reviews of Recent Writings

Judith A. Copier

首页> 外文期刊>Online & CD-Rom Review >Reviews of Recent Writings

【24h】

Reviews of Recent Writings

机译：最新著作的评论

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This column takes a critical view of publications of interest to ONLINE readers. ONLINE and its sister publications, DATABASE and EMedia Professional, are the only magazines in the industry that formally assign ratings to books that are reviewed. A FOUR-LOGO rating is considered outstanding, and is given only to books that are superior in every way. All publications are reviewed from the perspective of working online information professionals, which may cause higher or lower ratings than might be perceived as appropriate in the general press. We think the need for critical reviews is essential to good purchasing decisions, and it is our hope that readers will profit from the consistent, forthright, evaluative reviews provided by this award-winning columnist.

机译：本专栏评论了在线读者感兴趣的出版物。 ONLINE及其姊妹出版物DATABASE和EMedia Professional是业内唯一为已审阅的书正式指定等级的杂志。四个LOGO等级被认为是杰出的，并且仅授予在各方面都比较出色的书籍。所有出版物都是从在线信息专业人员的角度审阅的，这可能导致其收视率高于或低于一般媒体所认为的。我们认为需要严格的评论对于良好的购买决策至关重要，我们希望读者将从这位屡获殊荣的专栏作家提供的一致，直截了当的评估评论中受益。

著录项

来源
《Online & CD-Rom Review》 |1997年第3期|p.A82-A85|共4页
作者
Judith A. Copier;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类计算技术、计算机技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Demystifying Academic Writing in the Doctoral Program: Writing Workshops, Peer Reviews, and Scholarly Identities [J] . Planning Practice & Research . 2020,第3期

机译：在博士计划中发霉的学术写作：写作研讨会，同行评论和学术身份
2. Critical Review of Recent Studies Investigating Effects of Word Processing-Assisted Writing and Pen-and-Paper Writing on the Quality of Writing and Higher Level Revisions [J] . Yin Ling Cheung Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences . 2012,第2期

机译：近期研究对词处理辅助写作和纸笔书写对写作质量和更高水平修订的影响的研究进行了评论性综述
3. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. [J] . Feldman TE, Kern MJ, ONeill WW, Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2008,第2期

机译：2007年针对ACC / AHA / SCAI的重点更新，针对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的2005年指南更新：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告：2007年撰写新证据并更新ACC / AHA /的写作小组《 SCAI 2005年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南更新》，代写2005年写作委员会。
4. Collaborative Writing Strategy in EFL Classes: Comparing Individual and Pair Writing Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Learning Styles [C] . Ainul Addinna, Lafziatul Hilmi, Ririn Ovilia International Conference on English Language and Teaching . 2020

机译：EFL课程中的协作写作策略：从认知学习方式复查的个人和配对写作能力
5. The use of process writing and Internet technology in a Taiwanese college English writing class: A focus on peer reviews [D] . Huang, Mei-ching 2004

机译：在台湾大学英语写作课中使用过程写作和互联网技术：以同行评议为重点
6. Teaching writing functionally: A review of Peter Elbows writing with power [O] . Thomas M. Welsh 1987

机译：功能性写作教学：彼得·艾伯（Peter Elbow）的著作回顾
7. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) 11This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2002.22The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The conflict of interest information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC, AHA, and NASPE Web sites with the full-length version of the update.33When citing this document, the ACC, the AHA, and NASPE would appreciate the following citation format: Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol2002;40:1703–19.44Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (ask for No. 71-0237). To obtain a copy of the Summary Article, ask for reprint No. 71-0236. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.55(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703–19.)66©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gregoratos Gabriel, Abrams Jonathan, Epstein Andrew E, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会将更新1998年起搏器指南） 11该文件于2002年9月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准，于2002年8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准，并于2002年8月获得北美起搏和电生理学会的批准。22ACC / AHA工作组《实践指南》将尽一切努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审核，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。撰写委员会成员的利益冲突信息已发布在更新的完整版本的ACC，AHA和NASPE网站上。33当引用本文档时，ACC，AHA和NASPE将不胜感激。格式：Gregoratos G，Abrams J，Epstein AE，Freedman RA，Hayes DL，Hlatky MA，Kerber RE，Naccarelli GV，Schoenfeld MH，Silka MJ，Winters SL。 ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会更新了1998年起搏器指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol2002； 40：1703–19.44复制：此文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。您可以致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得一份完整的指南（请致电71-0237））。要获得摘要文章的副本，请索要第71-0236号转载。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或发送电子邮件至kbradle@lww.com.55（J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1703–19。）66©2002美国心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Reviews of Recent Writings

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅