首页> 外文期刊>Omega >Semantic network representation of computer-mediated discussions: Conceptual facilitation form and knowledge acquisition
【24h】

Semantic network representation of computer-mediated discussions: Conceptual facilitation form and knowledge acquisition

机译:计算机介导的讨论的语义网络表示:概念促进形式和知识获取

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Prior research on computer-mediated discussions examined their effects on knowledge acquisition without considering the role of the discussion representation. In this study, we investigate and compare the effect of semantic network discussion representations on knowledge acquisition to that of the threaded representations featured in most traditional discussion forums. Furthermore, we identify, define and operationalize a new, i.e., conceptual facilitation (validation of the conceptual organization of the discussion), assessing its role in knowledge acquisition at different levels of restrictiveness. The empirical results of a field experiment indicate that semantic network discussion representations enable the acquisition of more complex and better-integrated knowledge structures than threaded discussion representations. Conceptual facilitation forms entailing different levels of restrictiveness are also found to play a significant role. As the level of conceptual facilitation restrictiveness decreases, knowledge acquisition improves. Our findings empirically demonstrate the importance of accounting for discussion representation as a contingency factor in explaining group discussion processes and outcomes. To practitioners, our study provides empirical evidence on the advantages of semantic networks over threaded representations as an alternative mode for computer-mediated discussion representations. We also suggest guidelines for the selection of appropriate conceptual facilitation for discussion forums intended for knowledge acquisition.
机译:先前对计算机介导的讨论的研究在不考虑讨论代表角色的情况下检查了它们对知识获取的影响。在这项研究中,我们调查并比较了语义网络讨论表示对知识获取的影响与大多数传统讨论论坛中采用的线程表示的影响。此外,我们确定,定义和实施新的概念促进(概念性讨论的验证),并评估其在不同限制水平下在知识获取中的作用。现场实验的经验结果表明,与网络讨论表示相比,语义网络讨论表示能够获取更复杂和更好集成的知识结构。还发现需要不同程度限制的概念促进形式也起着重要作用。随着概念化便利限制水平的降低,知识获取也随之提高。我们的发现从经验上证明了将讨论代表作为解释小组讨论过程和结果的偶然性因素的重要性。对于从业者,我们的研究提供了有关语义网络相对于线程表示形式的优势的经验证据,该优势是作为计算机介导的讨论表示形式的替代方式。我们还建议为旨在获取知识的讨论论坛选择适当的概念便利的指南。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Omega》 |2008年第2期|p.252-266|共15页
  • 作者

    Mohamed Khalifa; Vanessa Liu;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号