首页> 外文期刊>OECD Papers >SMALLHOLDEER AND PRO-POOR AGRICULTURE GROWTH
【24h】

SMALLHOLDEER AND PRO-POOR AGRICULTURE GROWTH

机译:小农和有利于农业的增长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In many poor countries, small farm development offers an efficient and pro-poor option for agricultural development. However, small farms are seriously challenged today in ways that make their future precarious. Marketing chains are changing and are becoming more integrated and more demanding of quality and food safety. This is creating new opportunities for higher value production for farmers who can compete and link to these markets, but for many other small farms the risk is that they will simply be left behind. In developing countries, small farmers also face unfair competition from rich country farmers in many of their export and domestic markets, and they no longer have adequate support in terms of basic services and farm inputs. And the spread of HIV/AIDS is further eroding the number of productive farm family workers, and leaving many children as orphans with limited knowledge about how to farm. Left to themselves, these forces will curtail opportunities for small farms, overly favor large farms, and lead to a premature and rapid exit of many small farms. If most small farmers are to have a viable future, then there is need for a concerted effort by governments, NGOs and the private sector to create a more equitable and enabling economic environment for their development. This must include assistance•>in forming effective marketing organizations, targeted agricultural research and extension, revamping financial systems to meet small farm credit needs, improved risk management policies, tenure security and efficient land markets, and where all else fails, targeted safety net programs. In addition, the public sector needs to invest in the provision of basic infrastructure, health, education and other human capital to improve market access and to increase the range of nonfarm opportunities available to small farm households, including permanent migration to urban areas. These interventions are possible and could unleash significant benefits in the form of pro-poor agricultural growth. The associated public investments could also more than pay for themselves in terms of their economic and social returns. Unfortunately, the needed interventions do not seem very likely at present and current trends are moving in the wrong direction. For example, research and extension for small farms is declining, credit for small farms has virtually disappeared, and donor and government investment in crucial rural infrastructure is stagnant at best. Unless key policy makers adopt a new agenda towards small farm agriculture, there is growing risk that there will soon be a dramatic increase in rural poverty and waves of migrants to urban areas that could overwhelm available job opportunities, urban infrastructure and support services.
机译:在许多贫困国家,小农场的发展为农业发展提供了有效而有利于穷人的选择。但是,如今,小型农场面临着使其未来in可危的严峻挑战。营销链正在发生变化,变得越来越一体化,对质量和食品安全的要求也越来越高。这为可以竞争并链接到这些市场的农民创造了更高价值生产的新机会,但是对于许多其他小型农场来说,风险就是他们将被简单地抛在后面。在发展中国家,小农在许多出口和国内市场中也面临着富国农民的不公平竞争,他们在基本服务和农业投入方面已不再获得足够的支持。艾滋病毒/艾滋病的蔓延进一步侵蚀了生产性农场家庭工人的数量,并使许多儿童作为孤儿,对农业的知识有限。这些力量将留给自己,将减少小型农场的机会,过分偏爱大型农场,并导致许多小型农场过早迅速退出。如果大多数小农户要有一个可行的未来,那么就需要政府,非政府组织和私营部门共同努力,为他们的发展创造一个更加公平和有利的经济环境。这必须包括协助•>建立有效的营销组织,有针对性的农业研究和推广,改造金融体系以满足小型农场的信贷需求,改进风险管理政策,权属安全和有效的土地市场,以及在所有其他方面都失败的情况下,有针对性的安全网计划。此外,公共部门需要投资提供基本的基础设施,卫生,教育和其他人力资本,以改善市场准入并增加小农户可利用的非农机会的范围,包括向城市地区的永久移民。这些干预措施是可能的,并可能以扶贫农业增长的形式释放出巨大的利益。相关的公共投资还可以在经济和社会回报方面为自己带来回报。不幸的是,目前所需的干预措施似乎不太可能,当前的趋势正在朝错误的方向发展。例如,小型农场的研究和推广正在下降,小型农场的信贷实际上已经消失,捐助者和政府对关键农村基础设施的投资充其量也停滞不前。除非关键的政策制定者对小型农场农业采取新的议程,否则风险将越来越大,农村贫困将急剧增加,涌入城市地区的移民潮可能会淹没现有的就业机会,城市基础设施和支持服务。

著录项

  • 来源
    《OECD Papers》 |2004年第7期|p.356.1-356.12|共12页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fre
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:13:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号