首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >Benchmarking DRAGON/PARCS Against KRITZ and FFTF Measurements
【24h】

Benchmarking DRAGON/PARCS Against KRITZ and FFTF Measurements

机译:对照KRITZ和FFTF测量对DRAGON / PARCS进行基准测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Calculations have been conducted for the KRITZ-2 (KRITZ-LWR-RESR-001/002/003) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) (FFTF-LMFR-RESR-001) Nuclear Energy Agency benchmark problems using the PARCS reactor simulation code with lattice parameters generated by the DRAGON reactor physics code and with the MCNP6 Monte Carlo code. The benchmark analyses examined the DRAGON cross-section library, PARCS energy group structure, DRAGON fuel assembly modeling, and nuclide self-shielding effect. For KRITZ-2, the PARCS 2-group core calculations with a DRAGON 361-group library based on ENDF/B-VIII reproduced the benchmark k(eff) with a root-mean-square (rms) error of 0.19% delta k. DRAGON/PARCS also predicted the fission rates within 5%. The MCNP results are consistent with the DRAGON/PARCS results but with a small underestimation when compared to the benchmark value. For FFTF, the PARCS 33-group core calculations underpredicted the benchmark k(eff) by 0.19% delta k while the MCNP calculation overpredicted the benchmark k(eff) by 0.23% delta k. The neutron spectrum distributions calculated by PARCS and MCNP are consistent with measured data. Since the energy boundary values of the measured neutron spectrum are not available, the calculated spectra could not be directly compared to the measured value. The DRAGON/PARCS solution to a numerical benchmark of a gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR), i.e., the Energy Multiplier Module, predicted the k(eff) and assembly power with 0.46% delta k and 3.7% rms error, respectively, when compared to the MCNP simulation. The benchmark calculations of the selected thermal and fast reactors have shown that DRAGON/PARCS simulates small reactor cores with good accuracy.
机译:使用PARCS反应堆模拟对KRITZ-2(KRITZ-LWR-RESR-001 / 002/003)和快速通量测试设施(FFTF)(FFTF-LMFR-RESR-001)基准问题进行了计算DRAGON反应堆物理代码生成的晶格参数和MCNP6蒙特卡洛代码生成的晶格参数。基准分析检查了DRAGON截面库,PARCS能量组结构,DRAGON燃料组件模型以及核素自屏蔽效应。对于KRITZ-2,使用基于ENDF / B-VIII的DRAGON 361组库进行的PARCS 2组核心计算重现了基准k(eff),其均方根(rms)误差为0.19%Δk。 DRAGON / PARCS还预测了裂变率在5%以内。 MCNP结果与DRAGON / PARCS结果一致,但与基准值相比却被低估了。对于FFTF,PARCS 33组核心计算将基准k(eff)低估了0.19%增量k,而MCNP计算则将基准k(eff)高估了0.23%增量k。 PARCS和MCNP计算得到的中子谱分布与实测数据一致。由于无法获得测量的中子谱的能量边界值,因此无法将计算的谱直接与测量值进行比较。 DRAGON / PARCS解决方案以气冷快堆(GFR)的数值基准(即能源乘数模块)为基础,预测k(eff)和组装功率分别为0.46%Δk和3.7%rms误差。与MCNP仿真相比。选定的热反应堆和快速反应堆的基准计算表明,DRAGON / PARCS可以精确模拟小型反应堆堆芯。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2019年第3期|486-505|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Gen Atom, 3550 Gen Atom Court, San Diego, CA 92121 USA;

    Gen Atom, 3550 Gen Atom Court, San Diego, CA 92121 USA;

    Gen Atom, 3550 Gen Atom Court, San Diego, CA 92121 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Benchmark; DRAGON; PARCS; Fast Flux Test Facility; Energy Multiplier Module;

    机译:基准;DRAGON;PARCS;快速通量测试设施;能量倍增器模块;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:06:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号