首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear news >Looking back at the future
【24h】

Looking back at the future

机译:回顾未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As I was preparing to write my editorial and was also looking for a past Back-scatter column to run in this issue, since Bill Minkler was unable to write his column this month (see page 88), I came across an editorial by past Nuclear News editor Jon Payne. Its headline: "Spent-fuel storage: Same old story." It appeared in the October 1977 issue, the same issue from which I drew the Backscatter column. Both have to do with waste management (the topic of this issue's special section that begins on page 39, albeit with more of a D&D aspect) and spent fuel storage, topics we've been covering for lo these many years. In his editorial, Payne states, "Even if the [Carter] administration should propose that the government accept spent fuel, no one should lose sight of the lengthy path between proposal and implementation. Meanwhile, there is a flurry of inactivity. Some utilities have discussed building 'away from reactor' storage capacity, but are waiting to see the U.S. government's next move." Sounds familiar, doesn't it? They have been waiting for a very long time.
机译:当我准备撰写社论时,也正在寻找本期的《往后散布》专栏文章,因为比尔·明克勒本月无法撰写他的专栏文章(请参阅第88页),我遇到了过去《核能杂志》的一篇社论。新闻编辑乔恩·佩恩(Jon Payne)。它的标题是:“乏燃料存储:同样的古老故事。”它出现在1977年10月号上,也是我在《反向散射》专栏中引用的同一期。两者都与废物管理(本期专刊的主题从第39页开始,尽管更多涉及D&D方面)和乏燃料存储有关,这是多年来我们一直讨论的主题。佩恩(Payne)在社论中指出:“即使(Carter)政府提议政府接受乏燃料,也没有人会忽视提议与实施之间的漫长道路。与此同时,也有许多不活跃的情况。一些公用事业公司讨论了建造“远离反应堆”的储存能力,但正在等待美国政府的下一步行动。”听起来很熟悉,不是吗?他们已经等待了很长时间。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear news》 |2017年第13期|4-4|共1页
  • 作者

    Betsy Tompkins;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号