...
首页> 外文期刊>Medecine Nucleaire >Radiation protection following iodine-131 therapy for thyroid cancers: Comparison of two methods to calculate restriction times
【24h】

Radiation protection following iodine-131 therapy for thyroid cancers: Comparison of two methods to calculate restriction times

机译:碘131疗法治疗甲状腺癌后的放射防护:两种计算限制时间的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In France, it is required to give patients some written radiation safety advice following an iodine-131 therapy of thyroid. However, there is no regulatory methodology proposed to assess the restriction times required to limit radiation dose received by their family and by third persons. In this study, we compared two methods to perform the calculation of restriction times for differentiated thyroid cancer: the first one, called Global method, follows general recommendations and the second one, called PaDe method, provides customized recommendations based on the effective half-life measured for each patient during the 48 h of hospitalization. For these simulations, the input parameters for both methods were dose constraints, contact patterns, final dose rate measurement at discharge of the patient, effective half-life and dose rate variation with distance. For the Global method, these parameters were set and were not changed. For the PaDe method, the effective half-life and the final dose rate were adjusted for each patient. Comparison between the two methods was carried out for 103 patients. For 68.0% of the patients, no restrictions were necessary according to the PaDe method whereas the Global method required restrictions to be applied during up to 2 days. For almost 16.5% of them, restriction times estimated with the PaDe method were systematically lower. For the remaining 15.5%, at least one contact pattern restriction had to be increased according to the PaDe method. Furthermore, with the Global method, the same instructions were given to 97.0% of the patients. These results showed the limits of the Global method which does not consider individually tailored biological data. Eventually, the use of the personalized PaDe method optimizes the radiation protection by improving the well being of the patient or reinforcing the family and third person's protection. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
机译:在法国,在对碘131进行甲状腺治疗后,需要给患者一些书面的放射安全建议。但是,没有提出建议的管理方法来评估限制其家人和第三人所接受的辐射剂量所需的限制时间。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种方法来计算分化型甲状腺癌的限制时间:第一种方法称为Global方法,遵循一般建议,第二种方法称为PaDe方法,根据有效半衰期提供定制的建议在住院48小时内为每位患者进行的测量。对于这些模拟,这两种方法的输入参数是剂量限制,接触模式,患者出院时的最终剂量率测量,有效半衰期和剂量率随距离的变化。对于全局方法,这些参数已设置且未更改。对于PaDe方法,调整每位患者的有效半衰期和最终剂量率。对103例患者进行了两种方法的比较。对于68.0%的患者,根据PaDe方法没有限制是必要的,而Global方法要求在2天内应用限制。对于其中的近16.5%,用PaDe方法估算的限制时间在系统上更低。对于其余的15.5%,必须根据PaDe方法增加至少一种接触模式限制。此外,采用Global方法,对97.0%的患者给予了相同的指导。这些结果表明,全局方法的局限性没有考虑单独定制的生物学数据。最终,个性化PaDe方法的使用通过改善患者的健康状况或加强家庭和第三方的防护来优化辐射防护。 (C)2017 Elsevier Masson SAS。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号