...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research >Evaluation of two methods for using MR information in PET reconstruction
【24h】

Evaluation of two methods for using MR information in PET reconstruction

机译:评价在PET重建中使用MR信息的两种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using magnetic resonance (MR) information in maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction has been investigated in the last years. Recently, three methods to introduce this information have been evaluated and the Bowsher prior was considered the best. Its main advantage is that it does not require image segmentation. Another method that has been widely used for incorporating MR information is using boundaries obtained by segmentation. This method has also shown improvements in image quality. In this paper, two methods for incorporating MR information in PET reconstruction are compared. After a Bayes parameter optimization, the reconstructed images were compared using the mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of variation (CV). MSE values are 3% lower in Bowsher than using boundaries. CV values are 10% lower in Bowsher than using boundaries. Both methods performed better than using no prior, that is, maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) or MAP without anatomic information in terms of MSE and CV. Concluding, incorporating MR information using the Bowsher prior gives better results in terms of MSE and CV than boundaries. MAP algorithms showed again to be effective in noise reduction and convergence, specially when MR information is incorporated. The robustness of the priors in respect to noise and inhomogeneities in the MR image has however still to be performed.
机译:近年来,已在最大程度上利用磁共振(MR)信息对正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像重建进行后验(MAP)算法的研究。最近,已经评估了三种引入此信息的方法,并且认为Bowsher先驱是最好的。它的主要优点是它不需要图像分割。已经广泛用于合并MR信息的另一种方法是使用通过分割获得的边界。该方法还显示出图像质量的改善。在本文中,比较了两种将MR信息纳入PET重建的方法。经过贝叶斯参数优化后,使用均方误差(MSE)和变异系数(CV)比较重建的图像。在Bowsher中,MSE值比使用边界低3%。 Bowsher中的CV值比使用边界低10%。两种方法的性能都比不使用以前的方法更好,也就是说,在没有解剖信息的情况下,最大似然期望最大化(MLEM)或MAP就MSE和CV而言。最后,使用Bowsher先验合并MR信息在MSE和CV方面要比边界更好。 MAP算法再次显示出在降噪和收敛方面有效,特别是在合并了MR信息时。然而,关于MR图像中的噪声和不均匀性的先验鲁棒性仍然有待执行。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    University of Lisbon, Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (IBEB), Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal,Siemens Healthcare Portugal, Portugal;

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum ]uelich GmbH, D-52425 Juelich, Germany;

    University of Lisbon, Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (IBEB), Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal;

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum ]uelich GmbH, D-52425 Juelich, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    maximum a posteriori; anatomic information; bowsher; boundaries;

    机译:最大后验解剖信息;子界线;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号