【24h】

Performance comparison of dual-head PEM scanner by Monte Carlo simulation

机译:基于蒙特卡洛模拟的双头PEM扫描仪性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To evaluate the effects of the flat panel dimension on the overall performance qualitatively and quantitatively, the performance of two dual-head Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) cameras with different configurations, the 3×3 modules system and the 1×3 modules system, has been compared, using Monte Carlo simulation based on the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) open source software. Besides traditional evaluation methods, imaging capability in terms of spatial resolution and lesion detectability have been integrated into the evaluation. Compared with the 3×3 modules system, the 1 × 3 modules system produces higher spatial resolution along the direction of the 1-module side but lower resolution along the other direction. No significant difference in small and weak lesion visualization has been noted between two systems. In addition, the slight disadvantage in semi-quantification of the 1 × 3 modules system can be further compensated by other methods such as increasing the imaging time while still in a practically acceptable range.
机译:为了定性和定量地评估平板尺寸对整体性能的影响,具有不同配置的两个双头正电子放射乳腺摄影(PEM)相机(3×3模块系统和1×3模块系统)的性能如下:使用基于Geant4断层扫描应用程序(GATE)开源软件的Monte Carlo仿真进行了比较。除了传统的评估方法外,在空间分辨率和病变可检测性方面的成像能力已被整合到评估中。与3×3模块系统相比,1×3模块系统沿1模块侧的方向产生较高的空间分辨率,但沿另一方向产生的空间分辨率较低。在两个系统之间,在较小和较弱的病变可视化方面没有发现显着差异。此外,还可以通过其他方法来弥补1×3模块系统半量化中的轻微缺陷,例如增加成像时间,同时仍在可接受的范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号