首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research >Analysis of calibration data for the uranium active neutron coincidence counting collar with attention to errors in the measured neutron coincidence rate
【24h】

Analysis of calibration data for the uranium active neutron coincidence counting collar with attention to errors in the measured neutron coincidence rate

机译:铀活性中子符合计数环的校准数据的分析,注意测量的中子符合率的误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The declared linear density of ~(238)U and ~(235)U in fresh low enriched uranium light water reactor fuel assemblies can be verified for nuclear safeguards purposes using a neutron coincidence counter collar in passive and active mode, respectively. The active mode calibration of the Uranium Neutron Collar - Light water reactor fuel (UNO.) instrument is normally performed using a non-linear fitting technique. The fitting technique relates the measured neutron coincidence rate (the predictor) to the linear density of ~(235)U (the response) in order to estimate model parameters of the nonlinear Pade equation, which traditionally is used to model the calibration data. Alternatively, following a simple data transformation, the fitting can also be performed using standard linear fitting methods. This paper compares performance of the nonlinear technique to the linear technique, using a range of possible error variance magnitudes in the measured neutron coincidence rate. We develop the required formalism and then apply the traditional (nonlinear) and alternative approaches (linear) to the same experimental and corresponding simulated representative datasets. We find that, in this context, because of the magnitude of the errors in the predictor, it is preferable not to transform to a linear model, and it is preferable not to adjust for the errors in the predictor when inferring the model parameters.
机译:新鲜的低浓铀轻水反应堆燃料组件中〜(238)U和〜(235)U的声明线性密度可以分别使用被动模式和主动模式的中子符合计数套环来核实,以实现核保障目的。铀中子项圈-轻水堆燃料(UNO。)仪器的活动模式校准通常是使用非线性拟合技术进行的。拟合技术将测得的中子符合率(预测变量)与〜(235)U(响应)的线性密度相关联,以估计非线性Pade方程的模型参数,该参数通常用于对校准数据进行建模。可替代地,在简单的数据转换之后,也可以使用标准的线性拟合方法来进行拟合。本文使用测得的中子符合率中可能的误差方差幅度范围,将非线性技术与线性技术的性能进行了比较。我们开发了所需的形式主义,然后将传统方法(非线性)和替代方法(线性)应用于相同的实验数据和相应的模拟代表性数据集。我们发现,在这种情况下,由于预测器中误差的大小,最好不要转换为线性模型,并且最好在推断模型参数时不要针对预测器中的误差进行调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号