首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear fusion >Development and assessment of 2D fluid neutral models that include atomic databases and a microscopic reflection model
【24h】

Development and assessment of 2D fluid neutral models that include atomic databases and a microscopic reflection model

机译:开发和评估2D流体中性模型,包括原子数据库和微观反射模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Neutral particles play a crucial role in the plasma edge due to their strong interaction with the plasma. To capture all physics details most often a kinetic equation is solved using a Monte Carlo (MC) approach. Unfortunately, the MC noise hampers the convergence assessment of the solution of the coupled plasma-neutral equations. Moreover, the MC calculation time increases for high-collisional detached cases. In these high-collisional cases, however, the kinetic model may be well-approximated by a fluid neutral model, which can be solved deterministically. In this paper, we assess different fluid neutral models by comparing the resulting plasma sources to the sources from an MC simulation of the kinetic equation. The fluid models take into account the microscopic cross-sections and rate coefficients from the AMJUEL-HYDHEL databases, as well as the microscopic TRIM reflection model. We accomplish the latter without the introduction of any user-defined fitting parameters. We show that a pure pressure-diffusion equation provides accurate results for the particle source, but is inaccurate for the parallel momentum and ion energy source. Adding a parallel momentum equation gives maximum errors of about 9% for the momentum and 32% for the energy source. These errors are further reduced to respectively 6% and 14% by adding a separate neutral energy equation.
机译:由于中性粒子与等离子体之间的强相互作用,因此它们在等离子体边缘中起着至关重要的作用。要捕获所有物理细节,最常见的是使用蒙特卡洛(MC)方法求解动力学方程。不幸的是,MC噪声妨碍了耦合等离子体中立方程解的收敛性评估。而且,对于高碰撞分离情况,MC计算时间增加。但是,在这些高碰撞情况下,动力学模型可以通过流体中性模型很​​好地近似,这可以确定地求解。在本文中,我们通过将产生的等离子体源与动力学方程的MC模拟源进行比较,来评估不同的流体中性模型。流体模型考虑了AMJUEL-HYDHEL数据库的微观横截面和速率系数,以及微观TRIM反射模型。我们无需引入任何用户定义的拟合参数即可完成后者。我们表明,纯压力扩散方程为粒子源提供了准确的结果,但对于平行的动量和离子能量源却不准确。添加平行动量方程可得出最大动量误差约为9%,能量误差约为32%。通过添加单独的中性能量方程,这些误差分别进一步降低到了6%和14%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear fusion》 |2017年第11期|116043.1-116043.16|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, Leuven, Belgium;

    Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200A, Leuven, Belgium;

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, Leuven, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fluid approximation; neutrals; plasma edge modeling;

    机译:流体近似中立等离子边缘建模;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:41:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号