...
首页> 外文期刊>The North American journal of economics and finance >Bank fee-based shocks and the U.S. business cycle
【24h】

Bank fee-based shocks and the U.S. business cycle

机译:银行费用的冲击和美国商业周期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Efficient liquidity matching requires from banks to track external shocks (e.g., GDP growth shocks, stock market shocks and monetary policy shocks) in order to optimally allocate their assets between loans and other business lines. Profit maximizing banks have to rebalance their product-mix to take advantage of these changes. However, even though banking is cyclical, and contemporaneously reacts to shocks outside the banking sphere, there may also be some feedback effects at play, whereby bank changes, in turn, could affect economic and financial conditions. Generalizing the results of Marcucci and Quagliariello (2006, 2009), who indeed find an asymmetric impact of credit shocks on economic and financial time series in recession, we use a similar VAR framework to show that an even stronger feedback effect is prevalent for fee-based shocks. If the feedback effects of credit and fee-based shocks might have been both at play before the subprime crisis, the feedback effect of credit shocks seems to have faded away during the subprime crisis, whereas the feedback effect stemming from fee-based shocks has gained further strength.
机译:高效的流动性匹配需要银行跟踪外部冲击(例如,GDP增长震荡,股票市场冲击和货币政策冲击),以便在贷款和其他业务线之间进行最佳地分配其资产。利润最大化银行必须重新平衡他们的产品混合,以利用这些变化。然而,即使银行业务是周期性的,而且同时反应银行领域外的冲击,也可能在比赛中有一些反馈效果,从而反转银行变更可能影响经济和财务状况。概括Marcucci和Quagliariello(2006年,2009年)的结果,谁确实发现信贷休克对经济和金融时序序列的不对称影响,我们使用类似的var框架来表明费用普遍存在的反馈效果 - 基于冲击。如果在次贷危机前的信贷和费用的冲击的反馈效果可能都在戏剧中,信贷冲击的反馈效果似乎在次贷危机期间消失,而基于费用的冲击则源于基于费用的反馈效果进一步的力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号