首页> 外文期刊>Newsweek >Glitterati VS. Geeks
【24h】

Glitterati VS. Geeks

机译:GlitteratiVS。极客

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Larry lessig admits it: he's nervous. Who wouldn't be? This week the brainy Stanford law professor makes his first appearance before the U.S. Supreme Court-barely a decade after clerking for Justice Antonin Scalia-to argue a case that could redirect millions of dollars, rejigger the entertainment menu of the entire nation and liberate Mickey Mouse. In its narrowest context, Eldred v. Ashcroft deals with the seemingly arcane issue of the length of copyrights for books, films and music. But it's actually a high-noon showdown between two great industries at odds in the age of the Internet. In one corner there are the big studios and record labels, intent on protecting their property and their turf; their success in winning congressional goodies has been more reliable than a Hollywood happy ending. In the other stand the forces of high-tech innovation, who until recently wore their distrust of government like a badge of pride. Now the techie crowd understands that if Big Media gets the government to help lock up its content, consumers will have less reason to buy new computers and software.
机译:拉里·莱西格(Larry Lessig)承认:他很紧张。谁不会聪明的斯坦福大学法学教授本周首次在美国最高法院出庭-这是在为安东尼·斯卡利亚大法官担任文职的十年后-提出一个可以重新定向数百万美元,重新调整整个国家娱乐菜单并解放米老鼠的案子。在最狭context的背景下,Eldred诉Ashcroft案处理了看似神秘的书籍,电影和音乐的版权期限问题。但这实际上是互联网时代两大行业之间的午后摊牌。在一个角落里有大型工作室和唱片公司,旨在保护他们的财产和地盘。他们赢得国会好礼的成功比好莱坞的幸福结局更可靠。另一方面,高科技创新的力量,直到最近,他们都像对自豪的徽章一样,对政府不信任。现在,技术人员已经知道,如果Big Media让政府帮助锁定其内容,则消费者将没有更多理由购买新的计算机和软件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Newsweek》 |2002年第16期|p.40-42|共3页
  • 作者

    STEVEN LEVY;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号