首页> 外文期刊>Newsweek >Bush's Great Miscalculation
【24h】

Bush's Great Miscalculation

机译:布什的错误估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The great paradox of this presidential election is that Al Gore is the "candidate of substance," while George W. Bush—the source of the campaign's few fresh ideas—is typecast as a hopeless dunce. For this, Bush is mainly to blame, and it could cost him the election and deprive the nation of a needed debate about how to make government more effective and trustworthy. Almost all Gore's proposals (from new spending programs to "targeted" tax breaks) are leftover Clinton policies. Fair enough. Though claiming to be his "own man," Gore is essentially promising an extension of the Clinton administration. By contrast, Bush endorses a vague form of school vouchers, personal investment accounts for Social Security, a large income-tax cut and a sweeping review of military preparedness.
机译:这次总统大选的最大悖论是,戈尔是“实质候选人”,而竞选活动鲜为人知的源头乔治·W·布什则被当成绝望的笨蛋。为此,布什主要应受到指责,这可能会使他付出选举的代价,并使该国失去有关如何使政府更有效和更值得信赖的必要辩论。戈尔几乎所有的提议(从新的支出计划到“有针对性的”税收减免)都是克林顿的政策。很公平。戈尔虽然自称是“自己的人”,但实际上从根本上保证了克林顿政府的扩展。相比之下,布什赞同模糊的形式的学校凭证,用于社会保障的个人投资账户,大幅削减所得税和全面审查军事准备。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Newsweek》 |2000年第12期|p.37|共1页
  • 作者

    Robert J. Samuelson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:34:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号