首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >'We should expect scientists to be much more open, but also more boring'
【24h】

'We should expect scientists to be much more open, but also more boring'

机译:“我们应该期待科学家更加开放,也更加无聊”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

WHEN Stuart Ritchie was a graduate student in Edinburgh, UK, in 2011, he was involved in an incident that shook his faith in science. With two colleagues, he tried and failed to replicate a famous experiment on precognition, the ability to see the future. They sent their results to the journal that published the original research and received an immediate rejection on the grounds that the Journal didn't accept studies that repeated previous experiments. Ritchie remained a scientist - he is a psychologist at King's College London with a focus on studying human intelligence - but ever since that rejection, he has been on a crusade to air science's dirty laundry. His latest book is Science Fictions, in which he shows how, all too often, we can't rely on the facts that science provides.
机译:当斯图尔特里奇是英国爱丁堡的研究生时,在2011年,他参与了一个震惊了他对科学信仰的事件。他尝试过两位同事,并没有复制着名的对预知实验,能够看到未来的能力。他们向公布原始研究发表的杂志发出了结果,并立即拒绝了期刊,即期刊不接受重复以前的实验的研究。 Ritchie仍然是一位科学家 - 他是国王大学伦敦的心理学家,专注于学习人类智力 - 但自那时候,他一直在对空气科学的肮脏洗衣道。他的最新书是科学小说,他展示了如何,经常,我们不能依赖科学提供的事实。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2020年第3296期|36-39|共4页
  • 作者

    Stuart Ritchie;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:14:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号