首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >Why not just say yes?
【24h】

Why not just say yes?

机译:为什么不说是?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A year ago Rick Doblin pulled off a trick most thought was impossible. He convinced the US Food and Drug Administration to allow a clinical study on ecstasy as a treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Ecstasy, or MDMA, is one of the most demonised drugs in the world. And for years federal agencies had stalled research into marijuana, which is less controversial, as a treatment for conditions such as multiple sclerosis and extreme nausea. So winning government approval for a therapeutic study on MDMA was nothing short of astonishing. The question is: why has the research still not begun? The answer is that for the past 12 months Doblin has been locked in an extraordinary paper war over his experiment. His continuing difficulties suggest that ideological resistance to the legitimate medical use of recreational drugs remains as strong as ever, the FDA decision notwithstanding.
机译:一年前,里克·多布林(Rick Doblin)开了一个大多数人认为不可能的戏法。他说服美国食品和药物管理局允许对摇头丸进行临床研究,以治疗创伤后应激障碍。摇头丸,或摇头丸,是世界上最妖魔化的药物之一。多年来,联邦机构一直将对大麻的研究停滞不前,这种大麻的争议性较小,可用于治疗多发性硬化和极端恶心等疾病。因此,获得政府对MDMA的治疗性研究的批准无疑是令人惊讶的。问题是:为什么研究还没有开始?答案是,在过去的12个月中,多布林因实验而陷入一场非同寻常的书面战争中。他的持续困难表明,尽管有FDA的决定,但对消遣性药物合法医疗使用的意识形态抵抗力仍然一如既往。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2003年第2407期|p.26|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:57:06
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号