首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >MEN BEHAVING BADLY...
【24h】

MEN BEHAVING BADLY...

机译:男人表现得不好...

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Modern man. Is he a lying, scheming philanderer or a protective, fatherly companion? It turns out he's all of the above: he's your typical animal.rnAlthough, if I'm reading Faye Flam correctly, he's an animal that missed out on the really good stuff when it comes to sexual performance. He lacks the potent delivery system of the polyclad flatworm, a ribbon-like sea dweller whose acidic semen burns its way through to its target. He lacks a penis bone, which means that, unlike the walrus, he cannot be -well - ever ready. He also lacks the staying power of stick insects, which are capable of maintaining intercourse for months. And he doesn't even come close to his primate cousins: "A chimp boasts testicles twice thernsize of a man's and a sperm count that makes ours look dismal."rnIt's enough to make you wonder how the human species managed to successfully reproduce at all, much less overrun the planet. The Score doesn't really address thatrnquestion, but it makes a good case that, in a social species like our own, corrosive semen isn't nearly as effective a strategy as conniving one's way into the bedroom.
机译:现代人。他是一个骗人的骗子,还是一个保护性的父亲陪伴?事实证明,他具备以上所有条件:他是您的典型动物。尽管我正确地阅读了Faye Flam,但他是在性能力方面错过了真正好东西的动物。他缺乏多囊扁虫的强效传递系统,扁带虫是一种带状的海栖生物,其酸性精液会燃烧直至到达目标。他没有阴茎骨,这意味着,与海象不同,他无法做好任何准备。他还缺乏粘虫的持久力,这种虫能维持性交几个月。而且他甚至没有接近他的灵长类表亲:“黑猩猩拥有的睾丸比男人大两倍,而精子的数量却使我们看起来黯淡。” rn足以让你怀疑人类物种是如何成功繁殖的,更不用说超地球了。分数并没有真正解决这个问题,但是它提供了一个很好的例子,在像我们这样的社会物种中,腐蚀性精液的策略几乎不像让自己进入卧室的策略有效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2008年第2667期|48|共1页
  • 作者

    Deborah Blum;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:55:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号