首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >Irradiation debate
【24h】

Irradiation debate

机译:辐照辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From Clio Turton, Soil Association As Dominic Dyer made clear in "Kill all known germs" (25 June, p 28), there is no evidence that certified organic products are more likely to be contaminated by Escherichia coli. All food is susceptible, and recent European Union research even shows less contamination in organic livestock. The answer lies in controlling risks throughout the food chain. Consumer safety is the aim of all organic producers; growers and processors are independently inspected for organic certification, and must abide by strict hygiene guidelines and food safety laws. There is no evidence that "lives will be saved" if organic standards allow irradiation. EU organic regulations do not allow it because it does not fit with organic principles, which state that processing should guarantee to maintain the integrity and vital qualities of the food.
机译:来自土壤协会的Clio Turton,Dominic Dyer在“杀死所有已知细菌”(6月25日,第28页)中明确指出,没有证据表明认证的有机产品更可能受到大肠杆菌的污染。所有食物都是易感食品,欧盟最近的研究甚至显示有机牲畜的污染较少。答案在于控制整个食物链中的风险。消费者安全是所有有机生产者的目标。种植者和加工者要接受有机认证的独立检查,必须遵守严格的卫生准则和食品安全法。没有证据表明,如果有机标准物允许辐射,“将挽救生命”。欧盟有机法规不允许这样做,因为它不符合有机原则,该原则规定加工应保证保持食品的完整性和重要品质。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2011年第2821期|p.28|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号