【24h】

LETTERS

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I agreed with every word of Debora MacKenzie's commentary on the World Health Organization's response to the Ebola outbreak (19/26 December 2015, p 40), but I wish she had taken the argument one stage further. She refers to concerns about "upsetting" member states and obliquely to the need for funding. It is this that needs to be tackled directly and, very probably, that would mean upsetting a large number of people in high places. A very similar conclusion may be drawn about the outcome of the Paris climate talks (19/26 December 2015, p 7 and p 8): namely that national governments simply don't get what is going to be involved in terms of expenditure. The cash will ultimately come from citizens and businesses of those nations, and in turn taxation will need to increase.
机译:我同意黛博拉·麦肯齐(Debora MacKenzie)对世界卫生组织应对埃博拉疫情的评论的每一句话(2015年12月19日至26日,第40页),但我希望她将这一论点进一步推进。她提到对“令人沮丧”的成员国的担忧,并倾斜地提到资金的需求。这是需要直接解决的,很可能意味着在高处使大量人不安。关于巴黎气候谈判的结果(2015年12月19/26日,第7和第8页),可以得出一个非常相似的结论:即,各国政府根本不了解支出方面将涉及的内容。现金最终将来自这些国家的公民和企业,因此税收将需要增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2016年第3057期|52-53|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号