In this paper, I argue that filmmakers' experiences in their everyday practice challenge the dominant discourse on documentary filmmaking ethics. In this discourse, the responsibility of the filmmaker for the participant, with a focus on justice and care, takes centre-stage. However, what moral issues do filmmakers actually experience, what choices do they make, and how do these relate? Through a survey I investigated the experiences of an international group of documentary filmmakers with a variety of moral issues (such as disclosure, representation, and giving information) and with solutions to such issues (such as paying a participant, working in collaboration, and searching for an alternative). The results show that filmmakers mainly experienced mutual and continuous communication, getting done what is needed for the film; they take the position of a professional in doing so. Issues reflecting concern about the well-being of the participant, such as truth, respect for privacy, and care do not play a substantial role in these results. The results provide reason to give the commitment of filmmakers to their film a more prominent place in documentary filmmaking ethics: the aggie comes first indeed.1 â1. Nanook to filmmaker Robert Flaherty. See Barnouw (1993, 36). View all notes View full textDownload full textKeywordsdocumentary practice, survey, ethics, factor analysisRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2012.691249
展开▼