首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Theorising the Korean State beyond Institutionalism: Class Content and Form of ‘National’ Development
【24h】

Theorising the Korean State beyond Institutionalism: Class Content and Form of ‘National’ Development

机译:在制度主义之外理论化朝鲜国家:“民族”发展的阶级内容和形式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the Korean developmental state has been heavily discussed in various disciplines and across diverse political spectrums, the statist notion that the developmental state is autonomous from and disciplines society, and is therefore effective in achieving ‘national development’, has more often been taken for granted than problematised. Statism is also pervasive in institutionalism that emphasises the linkages rather than dichotomies between state and market and in the recent discussions on the transformation of the developmental state. This article proposes an alternative conceptual framework by reformulating ‘the form critique of the state’ pioneered by Evgeny Pashukanis and further developed in the ‘German state derivation debate’ on the one hand, and ‘world system analysis’ on the other. Extending the Marxist critique of ‘commodity fetishism’ to the theorisation of the developmental state, it inquires into the origins of statism and argues that it is the uneven dynamics of capitalism as a global system that give rise to statism in the first place.View full textDownload full textKeywordsKorean developmental state, late development, Evgeny Pashukanis, class content, social form, world-system analysisRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563461003789787
机译:尽管在各个学科和不同政治领域都对朝鲜的发展国家进行了广泛的讨论,但统计学家认为发展国家是独立于社会和自律社会的,因此有效地实现“国家发展”的国家观点理所当然,而不是成问题。在强调国家与市场之间的联系而不是二分法的制度主义中以及在最近关于发展性国家转型的讨论中,国家主义也很普遍。本文通过重新阐述“由国家专家Evgeny Pashukanis提出并在“德国国家派生辩论”中进一步发展的“国家形式评论”,以及“世界系统分析”,提出了一种替代性的概念框架。 €™另一方面。将马克思对“商品拜物教”的批判扩展到发展国家的理论上,它探究了国家主义的起源,并指出,资本主义作为全球体系的不均衡动力首先导致了国家主义的产生。查看全文下载关键词韩国的发展状况,后期发展,Evgeny Pashukanis,课程内容,社会形式,世界体系分析相关var addthis_config = { ,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563461003789787

著录项

  • 来源
    《New Political Economy》 |2011年第3期|p.281-302|共22页
  • 作者

    Hae-Yung Songa*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号