...
首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >The Competing Kings of Cotton: (Re)framing the WTO African Cotton Initiative
【24h】

The Competing Kings of Cotton: (Re)framing the WTO African Cotton Initiative

机译:竞争的棉花之王:(重新)构筑世贸组织非洲棉花倡议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since 2003, the West and Central African (WCA) cotton initiative in the World Trade Organization has stood as an ambitious case of Africa's desire to be integrated into the trading system and yet also receive reparations for past injuries. This article seeks to explore how and why the initiative debuted through close attention to the interdependence between power and language in diplomatic practice. It takes the concept of cognitive framing to explore the relationship between political legitimacy and mobilisation capacities. The genesis of cotton as ‘an issue’ is critically examined, focusing on how the WCA countries constructed a novel ‘competitive victim’ frame to define themselves and the problem. While this opening move was effective, it also featured tensions that were exploited by Northern actors who were threatened by the campaign. I argue that what followed was the introduction of a politically driven ‘counterframe’, which divided the problem into a ‘trade-related’ component and a ‘development-related’ component. It is important to understand why and how this distinction was constructed and monitored. By scrutinising the relationship between framing and institutional power, I suggest that the counterframe won over the original frame, leading to a re-positioning of the demanders and a re-calibration of their expectations.View full textDownload full textKeywordscotton, WTO, Africa, competitiveness, development, framingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.577207
机译:自2003年以来,世界贸易组织的西非和中非(WCA)棉花倡议就表明了非洲渴望融入贸易体系,同时又能为过去的伤害获得赔偿的雄心勃勃。本文旨在通过密切关注外交实践中权力与语言之间的相互依存关系,探索该倡议如何以及为何首次出现。它需要认知框架的概念来探索政治合法性与动员能力之间的关系。对棉花作为“问题”的成因进行了严格审查,重点是WCA国家如何构建新颖的“竞争受害者”框架来定义自己和问题。尽管这一开放举措是有效的,但它也表现出了受到该运动威胁的北方演员所利用的紧张局势。我认为,随之而来的是引入了一种政治驱动的“反框架”,它将问题分为“与贸易有关”的组成部分和与“发展有关”的组成部分。了解为什么以及如何构造和监视此区别很重要。通过仔细研究框架与制度力量之间的关系,我认为反框架胜过了原来的框架,从而导致了需求者的重新定位和他们期望的重新调整。查看全文下载全文,开发,框架相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.577207

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号