首页> 外文期刊>Neurological Research >Management of petrosal veins during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia
【24h】

Management of petrosal veins during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

机译:三叉神经痛微血管减压术中的岩脉管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Venous compression might be the main cause of incomplete decompression andnsymptom recurrence after microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with trigeminalnneuralgia. Although it can be killed in most cases, cutting the vein sometimes has the potentialnrisk arising from venous congestion. To maneuver the vein safely, we introduced a temporarynocclusion test of the vein.nMethods: Among 407 consecutive MVD cases, 48 (11.8%) offending and 157 block veins werenencountered. The vein was cut directly in 147 (71.7%). Owing to the potential risk followingnkilling of the vein, 58 (28.3%) patients underwent venous occlusion test with neurophysiologicnmonitoring during the operation. The temporal occlusion should be ceased immediately as soonnas any changes in brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) or trigeminal evoked potentialn(TEP) wave figuration turn up; otherwise, it would last for 15 minutes.nResults: The occlusion test was negative in 53 (91.4%), while positive in five patients (8.6%).nAccording to the results, we cut the vein in test-negative patients, which made the operation easynand offered a satisfactory decompression. Among the five positive cases, the vein was finallynsaved in two and cut in three cases. Yet, all the three patients developed a severe ipsilateralncerebellar edema and brainstem shift after the vein was sacrificed. Despite those patients werenreoperated on immediately for posterior fossa decompression, they remained equilibriumndisorder with numbness in ipsilateral face and mind hemiparesis in contralateral extremitiesnpost-operatively. The residual two patients had an incomplete pain relief.nConclusion: This venous occlusion test could help the surgeon in making a right decision beforenmanipulation of the petrosal veins during MVD. [Neurol Res 2008; 30: 697–700]
机译:目的:静脉压迫可能是三叉神经痛患者微血管减压(MVD)后减压不完全和症状复发的主要原因。尽管可以在大多数情况下将其杀死,但有时切断静脉有时会因静脉充血而引起潜在危险。为了安全地操纵静脉,我们引入了一个临时的静脉未闭塞试验。n方法:在407例连续MVD病例中,发现48例(11.8%)违规血管和157例阻塞静脉。将静脉直接切开147(71.7%)。由于静脉杀伤后可能存在的风险,因此在手术期间对58例(28.3%)的患者进行了静脉闭塞试验,并进行了神经生理学监测。一旦脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)或三叉神经诱发电位(TEP)波形化出现任何变化,应立即停止颞骨闭塞;否则,结果将持续15分钟。n结果:53例患者的闭塞试验(91.4%)为阴性,五例患者的阻塞试验为阳性(8.6%)。n根据结果,测试阴性的患者切开了静脉,操作简便,减压效果令人满意。在五例阳性病例中,最后将血管分为两部分,并切开了三例。然而,所有三名患者在处死静脉后均出现了严重的同侧小脑水肿和脑干移位。尽管这些患者因颅后窝减压立即不接受手术,但术后对侧肢体同侧脸部和脑部偏瘫仍保持平衡麻木。其余2例患者的疼痛缓解不完全。n结论:这项静脉阻塞试验可以帮助外科医生在MVD手术中对岩脉进行操作之前做出正确的决定。 [Neurol Res 2008; 30:697–700]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号