首页> 外文期刊>Neuro-Oncology >CODEL: phase Ⅲ study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design
【24h】

CODEL: phase Ⅲ study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design

机译:Codel:NOR,RT + TMZ或TMZ的Ⅲ期研究,用于新诊断的1P / 19Q Codeleted Oligodendroglioma。 初始研究设计分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. We report the analysis involving patients treated on the initial CODEL design.Methods. Adults (18) with newly diagnosed 1p/19q World Health Organization (WHO) grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to radiotherapy (RT; 5940 centigray ) alone (arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (arm B); or TMZ alone (arm C). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), arm A versus B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and progression-free survival (PFS), comparing pooled RT arms versus TMZ-alone arm.Results. Thirty-six patients were randomized equally. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) on the RT arms. PFS was significantly shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared with RT patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; P = 0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) on the RT arms. OS did not statistically differ between arms (comparison underpowered). After adjustment for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (mutated/wildtype) in a Cox regression model utilizing IDH and RT treatment status as covariables (arm C vs pooled arms A + B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; P = 0.011), but not OS ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 0.58, 13.22, P = 0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42%, and 33% of patients (arms A, B, and C). There were no differences between arms in neurocognitive decline comparing baseline to 3 months.Conclusions. TMZ-alone patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the RT arms. The ongoing CODEL trial has been redesigned to compare RT + PCV versus RT + TMZ.
机译:背景。我们报告了涉及在初始编解码器设计上患者的分析。方法。具有新诊断的1P / 19Q世界卫生组织(WHO)III级少突胚瘤的成人(> 18)被单独随机随机(RT; 5940)(ARM A); Rt伴随伴随和佐剂替莫唑胺(TMZ)(ARM B);或单独的TMZ(ARM C)。初级终点是总体存活(OS),ARM A对B.对OS和无进展生存(PFS)进行次要比较,比较汇集的RT臂与TMZ-单独的ARM。结果。三十六名患者同样随机随机化。在7.5岁的中位随访,83.3%(10/12)TMZ-单独的患者进展,与RT手臂上的37.5%(9/24)。与RT患者相比,PFS在TMZ独立患者中显着较短(危险比[HR] = 3.12; 95%CI:1.26,7.69; P = 0.014)。疾病进展死亡发生在3/12(25%)的TMZ-单独患者中,4/24(16.7%)在RT手臂上。操作系统在武器之间没有统计学意义(比较动力)。在使用IDH和RT治疗状态的Cox回归模型中调整异亚硝酸脱氢酶(IDH)状态(突变/野外型)作为协变量(ARM C VS汇集臂A + B),对于未接受RT的患者(HR = 3.33),PFS仍然较短; 95%CI:1.31,8.45; P = 0.011),但不是OS((HR = 2.78; 95%CI:0.58,13.22,P = 0.20)。3级不良事件发生在25%,42%,和33%的患者(ARM A,B和C)。神经认知下降的武器之间没有差异,将基线与3个月相比。结论。TMZ-单独的患者比在RT ARM上对待的患者显着缩短PFS。正在进行的编码REDESINGEDERING以比较RT + PCV而RT + TMZ进行试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号