【24h】

Comment

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This interesting and stimulating paper (referred to as GTW) discusses four issues: when capital should not be taxed, when labor taxes should be constant over time and states of nature, the sources of concern about limited government commitment, and the methodology of modeling for tax analysis. And it contains calculated examples. I will touch on three of these issues, leaving out the complex issue of how policy feasibility and desirability are influenced by the nature of the political process in democratic states. In the macro tradition, the analysis focuses on settings with stochastic shocks. To bring a public economics perspective, I will consider the first two issues in deterministic models with heterogeneous populations. Then I will consider a stochastic model to add to the intuition about taxing savings. For clarity of presentation, I work with models with only two types of workers and assume that the binding incentive compatibility constraint is that type-A not imitate type-B. I do not consider sufficient conditions for this pattern of constraints to be correct.
机译:这篇有趣且令人振奋的论文(称为GTW)讨论了四个问题:什么时候不应该对资本征税,什么时候随着时间和自然状态对劳动税保持不变,对有限政府承诺的担忧根源以及建模方法税收分析。它包含计算得出的示例。我将涉及其中三个问题,而忽略了一个复杂的问题,即民主国家政治进程的性质如何影响政策的可行性和可取性。在宏观传统中,分析的重点是随机冲击的设置。从公共经济学的角度来看,我将考虑具有异类种群的确定性模型中的前两个问题。然后,我将考虑一种随机模型,以增加对节余储蓄的直觉。为了清楚起见,我使用只有两种类型的工人的模型,并假设约束性激励相容性约束是A型不模仿B型。我认为没有足够的条件使这种约束模式正确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《NBER Macroeconomics Annual》 |2006年第2006期|p.365-379|共15页
  • 作者

    Peter Diamond;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:30:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号