首页> 外文期刊>Nature >The ecological cost of sex
【24h】

The ecological cost of sex

机译:性的生态代价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why sex prevails in nature remains one of the great puzzles of evolution. Sexual reproduction has an immediate cost relative to asexual reproduction, as males only express their contribution to population growth through females. With no males to sustain, an asexual mutant can double its relative representation in the population in successive generations. This is the widely accepted 'twofold cost of males. Many studies have attempted to explain how sex can recoup this cost from fitness benefits associated with the recombination of parental genotypes, but these require complex biological environments that cycle over evolutionary timescales. In contrast, we have considered the ecological dynamics that govern asexual invasion. Here we show the existence of a threshold growth rate for the sexual population, above which the invasion is halted by intraspecific competition. The asexual population then exerts a weaker inhibitory effect on the carrying capacity of the sexual population than on its own carrying capacity. The stable outcome of this is coexistence on a depleted resource base. Under these ecological circumstances, longer-term benefits of sex may eventually drive out the asexual competitor.
机译:为什么性在自然界盛行,仍然是进化的重大难题之一。与无性繁殖相比,有性繁殖具有直接的成本,因为男性仅通过女性表达其对人口增长的贡献。在没有男性维持的情况下,无性突变体可以连续几代将其相对代表性增加一倍。这是被广泛接受的男性的两倍成本。许多研究试图解释性如何从与父母基因型重组相关的健身益处中弥补这一代价,但这些都需要复杂的生物环境,需要在进化的时间尺度上循环。相比之下,我们考虑了控制无性入侵的生态动力学。在这里,我们显示了性人群的阈值增长率存在,在阈值增长率之上,种内竞争阻止了入侵。然后,无性人群对性人群的承受能力的抑制作用要弱于其自身的承受能力。稳定的结果是资源枯竭并存。在这些生态环境下,性的长期利益最终可能会驱逐无性竞争者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2000年第6775期|p.281-285|共5页
  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:57:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号