首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Is a scientific boycott ever justified?
【24h】

Is a scientific boycott ever justified?

机译:科学抵制有道理吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From time to time, groups of scientists pro-pose a boycott of researchers who are citizens of another country, as a political protest against that country's government. It is not widely known that such discrimination is explicitly forbidden by the International Council for Science (ICSU, www.icsu.org) as contrary to the principle of 'universality of science'. (See also Nature 417, 690; 2002 for a statement by the International Human Rights Network of Academies and Scholarly Societies.) ICSU includes nearly 100 national academies of science and research councils, and 26 international scientific unions. We believe that these constituent organizations should do more to make their members aware of the universality of science as a central axiom of scientific conduct. We also suggest that the principle should be taught in graduate training, and accepted as the norm for all scientists.
机译:有时,一群科学家提议抵制是另一个国家公民的研究人员,以抗议该国政府的政治抗议。众所周知,国际科学理事会(ICSU,www.icsu.org)明确禁止这种歧视,这与“科学普遍性”原则背道而驰。 (有关国际人权学院和学术团体网络的声明,另请参见Nature 417,690; 2002年。)ICSU包括将近100个国家科学院和研究理事会,以及26个国际科学联盟。我们认为,这些组成组织应该做更多的工作,以使其成员意识到科学作为科学行为的中心公理的普遍性。我们还建议应在研究生培训中教授该原理,并应将其作为所有科学家的准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号