首页> 外文期刊>Natural language & linguistic theory >Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking
【24h】

Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking

机译:连续循环案例分配:韩国主格-主格堆叠

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent literature, a debate has arisen between two theories of the calculation and realization of morphological case. The more commonly held Agree model states that all case features are assigned to nominals by nearby functional heads. Given a designated case-assigning functional head F, and a nominal alpha that is c-commanded by F, the case-marking associated with F will be assigned to alpha (Chomsky 2000, 2001). An alternative view, the Dependent Case model, holds that case is assigned to nominals given their structural relationship to one another. The case a nominal bears is dependent on the presence of other nominals within a defined domain (e.g. Yip et al. 1987; Marantz 1991; Bittner and Hale 1996). In this paper, I bring the phenomenon of Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking to bear on the current debate over Agree versus Dependent Case models. I argue that nominative-nominative stacking is incompatible with an Agree model of case-assignment. However, an emended Dependent Case model is well-suited to capture nominative-nominative case-stacking.
机译:在最近的文献中,在形态学案例的计算和实现的两种理论之间引起了争论。比较普遍持有的Agree模型指出,所有案例特征均由附近的功能头分配给标称。给定指定的案例分配功能头F,并使用F指挥的标称alpha,与F相关的案例标记将分配给alpha(Chomsky 2000,2001)。另一种视图是“从属案例”模型,它认为将案例分配给名义对象,因为它们之间存在结构关系。标称熊的情况取决于在定义域内其他标称物的存在(例如Yip等1987; Marantz 1991; Bittner and Hale 1996)。在本文中,我将韩语主格与主格堆叠现象纳入了当前关于“同意”与“从属案例”模型的争论。我认为主格-主格堆叠与案例分配的Agree模型不兼容。但是,经过改进的“从属案例”模型非常适合捕获名义-名义案例堆叠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号