首页> 外文期刊>Multiphase science and technology >COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR DRAG AND NON-DRAG FORCES FOR GAS-LIQUID TWO-PHASE BUBBLY FLOW
【24h】

COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR DRAG AND NON-DRAG FORCES FOR GAS-LIQUID TWO-PHASE BUBBLY FLOW

机译:气液两相气泡流的阻力模型与非阻力模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we have compared the effect of various interfacial forces such as drag, lift, wall lubrication and turbulent dispersion force. We analyze the contribution of these forces on numerical predictions of radial gas void fraction distribution, interfacial area concentration, and gas and liquid velocity profile. A CFD model has been developed for the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration in a vertical pipe. For the development of this CFD code, the experimental data were taken from the available literature. The experimental conditions are, pipe diameter of 48.3-51.2 mm, wide range of superficial liquid velocity 0.405-2.607 m/s, and gas superficial velocity 0.0111-1.275 m/s, and wide range of bubble diameters 2.5-9.3 mm. The void fractions vary from 1.89% to 25.7%. Based on the experimental data available in the literature, three cases of low bubble Reynolds number (Re_b ≈ 29), medium (Re_b ≈ 880), and high (Re_b ≈ 15,132), at the inlet have been selected. Different interfacial force models differ in the prediction of radial distribution of gas void fraction and interfacial area concentration. Based on the results obtained for comparison of interfacial forces, the Grace drag model, Tomiyama lift and wall lubrication model, and Burns turbulent dispersion force model were found to provide the best agreement with the experimental data.
机译:在这项研究中,我们比较了各种界面力的作用,例如阻力,升力,壁润滑和湍流分散力。我们分析了这些力对径向气孔分数分布,界面面积浓度以及气液速度分布的数值预测的贡献。已开发出CFD模型,用于预测垂直管中的气体空隙率的径向分布和界面区域浓度。为了开发该CFD代码,实验数据取自现有文献。实验条件为:管径为48.3-51.2 mm,表观液体速度的宽范围为0.405-2.607 m / s,气体表观速度为0.0111-1.275 m / s,气泡直径的范围较宽,为2.5-9.3 mm。空隙率从1.89%到25.7%。根据文献中的实验数据,选择了入口处低气泡雷诺数(Re_b≈29),中等(Re_b≈880)和高气泡(Re_b≈15,132)的三种情况。不同的界面力模型在气体空隙率的径向分布和界面面积浓度的预测上不同。根据比较界面力的结果,发现格雷斯阻力模型,富山升力和壁润滑模型以及伯恩斯湍流弥散力模型与实验数据最吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号