首页> 外文期刊>Modern Railways >OPEN ACCESS: CONFLICT OR CUSTOMER CHOICE?
【24h】

OPEN ACCESS: CONFLICT OR CUSTOMER CHOICE?

机译:公开访问:冲突还是客户选择?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Michael Holden's Presidential Address to the Railway Study Association (p52, November) made some interesting observations. In particular, his view of moving away from long distance high speed franchises in favour of a more commercial and competitive model is one that those passengers who currently enjoy competition in their choice of operators will recognise and no doubt support. The role of the Department for Transport in tightly specifying such franchises is one of the major failures of the current system, and the position has evolved to such an extent that the DfT often sees itself as judge, jury and executioner in an attempt to eradicate real competition. For services which deliver a Public Service Obligation (that are socially desirable and deemed necessary but wouldn't otherwise be operated), then it is right that specification is detailed, but in the area of long distance high speed rail travel things have become far too prescriptive, stifling innovation and opportunities.
机译:迈克尔·霍尔顿(Michael Holden)在铁道研究协会的总统致辞中(11月,第52页)发表了一些有趣的看法。尤其是,他放弃长途高速特许经营而转向更具商业性和竞争性的模式的观点是,那些目前在其运营商选择中享有竞争的乘客将肯定并且无疑会给予支持。运输部在严格指定此类特许经营权方面的作用是当前系统的主要失败之一,而且这种情况已经发展到一定程度,以至于DfT经常将自己视为法官,陪审团和execution子手,以铲除实际存在的问题。竞争。对于提供公共服务义务的服务(在社会上是合意的,被认为是必要的,但不会通过其他方式进行运营),那么对规范进行详细说明是正确的,但是在长途高铁旅行领域,事情也变得遥遥无期规范性的,扼杀性的创新和机遇。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Modern Railways》 |2015年第796期|48-49|共2页
  • 作者

    IAN YEOWART;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号