【24h】

Correct balance

机译:正确的平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am writing in response to one of the letters from G. K. Bartlett, which was published in MEW No 174. The writer claims that MEW has 'deteriorated of late and has become somewhat simplistic'. As a new reader, I am in no position to comment on any deterioration that may have taken place over a long period of time. What I can say, is that I think the editorial balance is just right and that is something which must be difficult to achieve. New readers such as me find the 'simplistic' articles very useful indeed, and I have learned a great deal from them. I freely confess to not understanding some of the more advanced articles but I do hope that in the fullness of time they will appear less mysterious. A magazine such as MEW has to appeal to a wide spectrum of readers. It certainly meets the needs of newcomers to the hobby, and I suspect from the content of many of the articles, that it is also meeting the needs of the more advanced model engineer as well. So please, leave things just the way they are. You are doing a fantastic job.
机译:我写这封信是为了回应G. K. Bartlett的一封信,该信已出版在MEW 174号中。作者声称MEW最近“恶化了,变得有些简化了”。作为新读者,我无权对长期以来可能发生的任何恶化发表评论。我可以说的是,我认为社论之间的平衡是正确的,而这是很难实现的。像我这样的新读者发现,“单纯化”的文章确实非常有用,而且我从他们中学到了很多东西。我坦率地承认自己不了解某些更高级的文章,但我希望它们在足够的时间内不会显得神秘。 MEW之类的杂志必须吸引广泛的读者。它肯定满足了新手的兴趣,从许多文章的内容中我怀疑,它也满足了更高级的模型工程师的需求。因此,请保持原样。您做的很棒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号