首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Insideview
【24h】

Insideview

机译:内部视图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Debate has been raging in recent weeks about whether the public have begun to notice the impact of cuts to local government services, following a recent opinion poll which suggested they hadn't, and the prime minister's own intervention in his own local council's approach to budget constraints. Much focus is placed on the big spending budgets of adult and children's services, ones that the public are often not regularly engaged with, ironically the services that they experience on a daily basis, like parks, public realm, refuse and leisure services are being eroded significantly. So will these cuts go unnoticed for much longer? And can these services stand further reductions if the 30% pre-announced cuts to the Department for Communities and Local Government at departmental level end up transferring down to council budgets?
机译:最近几周,关于公众是否已经开始注意到削减地方政府服务的影响,最近的民意测验一直在激烈辩论。最近的民意调查表明,削减开支没有影响,以及总理自己干预了地方议会的预算方法。约束。重点放在成人和儿童服务的大笔支出预算上,而公众通常不经常使用这些预算,具有讽刺意味的是,他们每天所体验的服务,如公园,公共场所,垃圾和休闲服务正在受到侵蚀。显着。那么,这些削减会不会被人们注意到更长时间?如果预先宣布的部门级社区和地方政府部门30%的削减最终转移到议会预算中,这些服务是否还能进一步减少?

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2015年第26期|13-13|共1页
  • 作者

    Paul OBrien;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号