首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Procurement scrutinised
【24h】

Procurement scrutinised

机译:采购审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The way the public sector procures what it wants has been changing in recent times and it looks set to continue. Rather than pay a fee for the delivery of a service - an input - contracts are aimed much more at purchasing some sort of output. This has been termed payment by results (PbR). When it comes to interventions that are about social outcomes, the natural move has been to have payment linked to the achievement of those outcomes. Rather than pay people who work with the unemployed, pay them only if they get them into work. But, for all their appeal in principle, such contracts also have the potential to raise problems. Many of these have surfaced in the Work Programme which uses PbR extensively.
机译:最近,公共部门获取其想要的东西的方式已经发生了变化,并且看起来将继续下去。合同不是支付服务交付的费用(一种投入),而是更多地用于购买某种产出。这被称为按结果付款(PbR)。当涉及与社会成果有关的干预措施时,自然的举动就是使报酬与这些成果的实现挂钩。与其付钱给与失业者一起工作的人,不如付给他们上班的薪水。但是,尽管从原则上讲,这些合同也有可能引起问题。其中许多已在广泛使用PbR的工作计划中浮出水面。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2015年第jul9期|11-11|共1页
  • 作者

    Dan Corry;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号