...
首页> 外文期刊>MIT Sloan Management Review >Revisiting Complexity In The Digital Age
【24h】

Revisiting Complexity In The Digital Age

机译:重新审视数字时代的复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As businesses have entered new geographies, developed new products, opened new channels and added more granular customer segments, they have made their offerings more complex with the intention of adding value. But, as a seemingly inevitable consequence, companies also have made it more difficult for customers to interact with them and more unwieldy for their employees to get things done. For organizations, there has thus been a trade-off between good and bad complexity.rnIn the digital economy, however, companies can finesse this trade-off and increase value-addingcomplexity in their offerings while keeping processes simple for customers and employees. Consider Amazon.com Inc.'s 10 million products, which create value without confusing customers, thanks to simple customer-facing processes that use digital tools such as search, recommendations, customer reviews and seller ratings to help site users choose among the many available products. Another example is Royal Philips, which uses and reuses digitized platforms - and is able to offer locally differentiated products in 60 categories in more than 100 countries.rnThe authors explain how companies can achieve their "complexity sweet spot" in the digital age -that is, the maximum value from varied and integrated product offerings with the simplest processes. The authors' research suggests that companies operating in this complexity sweet spot outperform their industry competitors on profitability. There are several routes to the sweet spot. One of the biggest decisions is who will lead and manage a company's complexity, as no one executive (save the CEO) really oversees all product and service development and operations. Whoever is leading a company's search for the complexity sweet spot needs to lead a cultural change to embed complexity management into the company's DNA. The good news, according to the authors, is that there are almost always quick wins, and the rewards are, well, sweet.
机译:随着企业进入新的地区,开发新产品,开辟新渠道并增加更细化的客户群,他们为增加价值而使产品变得更加复杂。但是,看似不可避免的结果是,公司也使客户与客户互动变得更加困难,并使员工无法完成工作。因此,对于组织而言,需要在复杂性的好坏之间进行权衡。在数字经济中,公司可以权衡这种权衡并增加产品增值的复杂性,同时使客户和员工的流程变得简单。考虑一下Amazon.com Inc.的一千万种产品,这些产品可以通过不依赖客户的简单流程使用数字工具(例如搜索,推荐,客户评论和卖家评分)来帮助网站用户从众多可用商品中进行选择,从而创造价值而不会混淆客户产品。另一个例子是皇家飞利浦(Royal Philips),它使用和重复使用数字化平台-并能够在100多个国家/地区提供60种类别的本地差异化产品。作者解释了公司如何在数字时代实现其“复杂性最佳点”- ,通过最简单的流程提供多样化和集成的产品,从而获得最大价值。作者的研究表明,在如此复杂的最佳位置运营的公司在盈利能力方面优于其行业竞争对手。有几条到达最佳地点的路线。最大的决定之一是由谁来领导和管理公司的复杂性,因为没有人高管(除CEO外)真正监督所有产品和服务的开发与运营。领导公司寻求复杂性最佳位置的人需要领导文化变革,以将复杂性管理嵌入公司的DNA中。这组作者说,好消息是,几乎总是有快速获胜的机会,而回报却是甜蜜的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号