首页> 外文期刊>MIS quarterly >A MULTILEVEL MODEL OF RESISTANCE TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION
【24h】

A MULTILEVEL MODEL OF RESISTANCE TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION

机译:抵制信息技术实施的多层次模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To better explain resistance to information technology implementation, we used a multilevel, longitudinal approach. We first assessed extant models of resistance to IT. Using semantic analysis, we identified five basic components of resistance: behaviors, object, subject, threats, and initial conditions. We further examined extant models to (1) carry out a preliminary specification of the nature of the relationships between these components and (2) refine our understanding- of the multilevel nature of the phenomenon. Using analytic induction, we examined data from three case studies of clinical information systems implementations in hospital settings, focusing on physicians'resistance behaviors. The resulting mixed-determinants model suggests that group resistance behaviors vary during implementation. When a system is introduced, users in a group will first assess it in terms of the interplay between its features and individual and/or organizational-level initial conditions. They then make projections about the consequences of its use. If expected consequences are threatening, resistance behaviors will result. During implementation, should some trigger occur to either modify or activate an initial condition involving the balance of power between the group and other user groups, it will also modify the object of resistance, from system to system significance. If the relevant initial conditions pertain to the power of the resisting group vis-a-vis the system advocates, the object of resistance will also be modified, from system significance to system advocates. Resistance behaviors will follow if threats are perceived from the interaction between the object of resistance and initial conditions. We also found that the bottom-up process by which group resistance behaviors emerge from individual behaviors is not the same in early versus late implementation. In early implementation, the emergence process is one of compilation, described as a combination of Independent, individual behaviors. In later stages of implementation, if group level initial conditions have become active, the emergence process is one of composition, described as the convergence of individual behaviors.
机译:为了更好地说明对信息技术实施的抵制,我们使用了多层次的纵向方法。我们首先评估了现有的IT抵抗模型。通过语义分析,我们确定了抵抗的五个基本组成部分:行为,对象,主体,威胁和初始条件。我们进一步检查了现有模型,以(1)对这些组件之间的关系的性质进行初步说明,并(2)完善我们对现象的多层次性质的理解。使用分析归纳法,我们检查了来自医院环境中临床信息系统实施的三个案例研究的数据,重点是医生的抵抗行为。由此产生的混合决定因素模型表明,在实施过程中,群体抵抗行为会有所不同。引入系统后,组中的用户将首先根据其功能与个人和/或组织级别的初始条件之间的相互影响进行评估。然后,他们对使用它的后果做出预测。如果预期的后果具有威胁性,则会导致抵抗行为。在实施过程中,如果发生一些触发来修改或激活涉及该组与其他用户组之间的力量平衡的初始条件,那么它还将从系统到系统的意义上修改抵抗的对象。如果相关的初始条件与反对派相对于系统提倡者的权力有关,那么抵抗的对象也将被修改,从系统重要性到系统提倡者。如果从抵抗对象和初始条件之间的相互作用中感知到威胁,就会出现抵抗行为。我们还发现,在早期和晚期实施过程中,从集体行为到个人抵抗行为的自下而上的过程并不相同。在早期实施中,出现过程是编译过程之一,被描述为独立,独立行为的组合。在实施的后期阶段,如果组级别的初始条件变得活跃,那么出现过程就是其中之一,被描述为个体行为的融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号