首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >The 'Negotiated Space' of University Researchers' Pursuit of a Research Agenda
【24h】

The 'Negotiated Space' of University Researchers' Pursuit of a Research Agenda

机译:大学研究者追求研究议程的“谈判空间”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The paper introduces a concept of a 'negotiated space' to describe university researchers' attempts to balance pragmatically, continually and dynamically over time, their own agency and autonomy in the selection of research topics and pursuit of scientific research to filter out the explicit steering and tacit signals of external research funding agencies and university strategies and policies. We develop this concept to explore the degree of autonomy researchers in fact have in this process and draw on semi-structured interview material with research group leaders in Finland and the UK, in the former in seven research fields, in the latter in two fields. First, the analysis reveals that topic selection is strongly filtered by the intra-scientific factors. In topic selection researchers have more leeway, a broader negotiated space than in research content, that is, in the ways in which they pursue their research, which are more affected by funding opportunities and other contextual matters. Second, the ways which affect researchers' agency include individual- and more aggregate-level acts and factors: at the individual level, researchers resort to different strategies to create a negotiated space, but at the more aggregate level field-specific factors play a role. In fields with multiple funding opportunities, which we call 'shopping mall' fields, researchers can have a broader negotiated space than in fields where funding is more based on 'lottery'. In the latter, the researchers' negotiated space is narrow and contingent on the outcome of the funders' decisions.
机译:本文介绍了“协商空间”的概念,以描述大学研究人员试图在一段时间内不断务实地,务实地保持平衡,他们在选择研究主题和进行科学研究以滤除显式指导和追求的过程中自身的代理权和自主权之间的平衡。外部研究资助机构和大学策略与政策的默认信号。我们发展这一概念来探索研究人员实际上在此过程中的自主程度,并利用与芬兰和英国研究小组负责人的半结构化访谈材料,前者在七个研究领域中,后者在两个领域中。首先,分析表明,主题选择受到科学内部因素的强烈过滤。在主题选择方面,研究人员比研究内容(即,他们从事研究的方式)具有更大的回旋余地,更广阔的协商空间,这更多地受到资金机会和其他背景问题的影响。其次,影响研究人员代理的方式包括个人层面和更多层面的行为和因素:在个体层面上,研究人员诉诸于不同的策略来创造协商的空间,但是在整体层面上,特定领域的因素发挥了作用。 。在具有多个融资机会的领域(我们称为“购物商场”领域),研究人员可以比在更大程度上基于“彩票”的领域拥有更大的协商空间。在后者中,研究人员的谈判空间狭窄,并取决于资助者决定的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号