...
首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Knowledge, Democracy, and the Internet
【24h】

Knowledge, Democracy, and the Internet

机译:知识,民主与互联网

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The internet has considerably changed epistemic practices in science as well as in everyday life. Apparently, this technology allows more and more people to get access to a huge amount of information. Some people even claim that the internet leads to a democratization of knowledge. In the following text, we will analyze this statement. In particular, we will focus on a potential change in epistemic structure. Does the internet change our common epistemic practice to rely on expert opinions? Does it alter or even undermine the division of epistemic labor? The epistemological framework of our investigation is a naturalist-pragmatist approach to knowledge. We take it that the internet generates a new environment to which people seeking information must adapt. How can they, and how should they, expand their repertory of social markers to continue the venture of filtering, and so make use of the possibilities the internet apparently provides? To find answers to these questions we will take a closer look at two case studies. The first example is about the internet platform WikiLeaks that allows so-called whistle-blowers to anonymously distribute their information. The second case study is about the search engine Google and the problem of personalized searches. Both instances confront a knowledge-seeking individual with particular difficulties which are based on the apparent anonymity of the information distributor. Are there ways for the individual to cope with this problem and to make use of her social markers in this context nonetheless?
机译:互联网已大大改变了科学以及日常生活中的认知实践。显然,该技术使越来越多的人可以访问大量信息。甚至有人声称互联网导致知识民主化。在下文中,我们将分析此语句。尤其是,我们将专注于认知结构的潜在变化。互联网会改变我们常见的认知实践以依靠专家意见吗?它会改变甚至破坏认知劳动的分工吗?我们研究的认识论框架是自然主义-实用主义的知识方法。我们认为,互联网创造了一个新的环境,寻求信息的人们必须适应这一新环境。他们如何以及应该如何扩展社交标记的功能范围,以继续进行过滤的冒险,从而利用互联网显然提供的可能性?为了找到这些问题的答案,我们将仔细研究两个案例研究。第一个示例是有关互联网平台WikiLeaks的,该平台允许所谓的举报者匿名分发其信息。第二个案例研究是关于搜索引擎Google和个性化搜索的问题。两种情况都面对着一个寻求知识的人,这些人特别困难,这是基于信息分发者的明显匿名性。尽管如此,个人是否有办法解决这个问题并在这种情况下利用她的社会标志?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号