首页> 外文期刊>Memory >SKOOL versus ZOOL: Effects of orthographic and phonological long-term memory on nonword immediate serial recall
【24h】

SKOOL versus ZOOL: Effects of orthographic and phonological long-term memory on nonword immediate serial recall

机译:SKOOL与ZOOL:正字法和语音长期记忆对非单词立即序列记忆的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a now-classic study Besner and Davelaar (1982) reported an advantage of pseudohomophone (PSH) over nonword recall in a visual immediate serial recall (ISR) task, which remained under articulatory suppression (AS), and interpreted the findings as indicating PSH items obtain support from stored phonological long-term memory (LTM) representations even when phonological rehearsal is disrupted. However, one key question relating to this PSH effect remains: could the results have been contaminated by a potential confound of orthographic familiarity (i.e., PSH items often look like the word they sound like)? As a result, the present study examined the impact of orthography on PSH ISR. Our findings indicate that PSH accuracy was consistently higher for items that had an orthographic similarity to the parent word, and this effect did not interact with concurrent task. We therefore argue that PSH items in ISR obtain independent support from both orthographic and phonological LTM representations. The present study demonstrates the critical impact of orthographic LTM representations on visual nonword ISR, and we suggest that this may be a fruitful avenue for further research.
机译:在一项现在很经典的研究中,Besner和Davelaar(1982)报道了在视觉立即序列召回(ISR)任务中,伪谐音(PSH)优于非单词召回的优势,该任务仍在发音抑制(AS)下,并且将发现解释为指示PSH即使语音排练受到干扰,这些项目也可以从存储的语音长期记忆(LTM)表示中获得支持。但是,与PSH效果有关的一个关键问题仍然存在:结果是否可能被拼写法熟悉程度的潜在混淆所污染(即PSH物品通常看起来像它们听起来像的单词)?结果,本研究检查了正字法对PSH ISR的影响。我们的发现表明,与父字在字形上相似的项目的PSH准确性始终较高,并且这种效果与并发任务没有相互作用。因此,我们认为,ISR中的PSH项获得了拼字法和语音LTM表示的独立支持。本研究证明了正字法LTM表示对视觉非单词ISR的关键影响,我们建议这可能是进一步研究的富有成果的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号