首页> 外文期刊>Measuring Business Excellence >Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
【24h】

Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

机译:使用层次分析法(AHP)优先考虑协调供应链的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Coordinated supply chain is concerned with managing dependencies between various members and joint efforts of all members to achieve mutually defined goals. The purpose of this paper is to identify and prioritize the factors for a coordinated supply chain. Design/methodology/approach - Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to prioritize the factors for a coordinated supply chain. By using AHP global desirability index of five strategic factors for coordinated supply chain their 23 sub-factors have been calculated and compared. Findings - In this study 23 factors affecting coordination in a supply chain are considered. These factors are grouped under five strategic factors such as top management commitment, mutual understanding, relationship and decision-making, flow of information and organizational factors. It is observed that the global weightage of top management commitment is highest among strategic factors and agreed vision and goal of supply chain members among sub factors. Research limitations/implications - AHP has some limitations. A major limitation is that the rating scale used in the AHP analysis is conceptual and there are chances of bias while giving relative weightage to different factors. Practical implications - Top management should strive for an agreed vision and a common goal among all members of the supply chain to have effective coordination. Originality/value - This study prioritizes factors for a coordinated supply chain in the Indian context and the findings will be significant while formulating strategies.
机译:目的-协调的供应链涉及管理各个成员之间的依赖性以及所有成员共同努力以实现相互定义的目标。本文的目的是确定协调供应链的因素并确定其优先级。设计/方法/方法-层次分析法(AHP)用于确定协调供应链的因素的优先级。通过使用AHP的五个战略因素的全球合意性指数来协调供应链,计算并比较了它们的23个子因素。调查结果-在这项研究中,考虑了23个影响供应链协调的因素。这些因素分为五个战略因素,例如最高管理者的承诺,相互理解,关系和决策,信息流和组织因素。可以看出,在战略因素中,高层管理承诺的全球权重最高,在子因素中,供应链成员的共识愿景和目标是最高的。研究局限性/含义-AHP有一些局限性。一个主要的限制是,AHP分析中使用的评级量表是概念性的,在给不同因素赋予相对权重的同时,存在偏差的机会。实际意义-高层管理人员应争取在供应链所有成员之间达成一致的愿景和共同目标,以进行有效的协调。原创性/价值-这项研究在印度背景下对协调供应链的因素进行了优先排序,在制定策略时这一发现将具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号