首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Likert or Not, Survey (In)validation Requires Explicit Theories and True Grit
【24h】

Likert or Not, Survey (In)validation Requires Explicit Theories and True Grit

机译:不论是否喜欢,调查(内部)验证都需要明确的理论和本领

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

From the time of Likert (1932) on, attitudes of expediency regarding both theory and methodology became apparent with reference to survey construction and validation practices. In place of theory and more-theoretically minded methods, such as those found in the early work of Thurstone (1928) and Coombs (1964), statistical models and methodological heuristics have come to dominate, with the result of gross simplification of complex techniques. Maul's Focus article lampoons this atheore-tical attitude with a rhetorical flair that is all too rare in this literature. More importantly, it draws stark attention to the scientific and ethical dilemmas that this attitude has created as self-report, survey-based instruments have become ubiquitous in psychological research, education systems, and modern society more generally.
机译:从李克特(1932)时代起,参照调查结构和验证实践,对理论和方法上的权宜之计变得显而易见。取代了理论和更具理论性的方法,例如在Thurstone(1928)和Coombs(1964)的早期工作中发现的方法,统计模型和方法试探法已成为主流,其结果是复杂技术的总体简化。 Maul's Focus的文章以一种夸张的天赋来嘲讽这种理论态度,这在本文献中是很少见的。更重要的是,它引起了人们对这种态度在自我报告中所产生的科学和伦理困境的关注,而这种困境是基于心理学的研究,教育系统和现代社会中普遍存在的基于调查的工具。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2017年第4期|91-94|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment (OUCEA), Department of Education, University of Oxford;

    Department of Psychology, Macquarie University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:54:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号