首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Epistemic Iterations and Consensus Definitions of Validity George
【24h】

Epistemic Iterations and Consensus Definitions of Validity George

机译:有效性的认知迭代和共识定义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In summary, it is important to consider whether or not Newton (this issue) has accomplished his two goals. Our view is that he has provided a clarification of the concept of validity. From the lens of progress in measurement based on epistemic iterations, he has provided a helpful snapshot of a consensus definition that can lay the foundation for the next iteration. Newton has presented a useful description of how the concept of validity has changed over time, and his views are bound to stimulate additional debate and discussion on one of the foundational ideas in measurement in the human sciences. Newton's research plays an important role in highlighting historical changes in definitions of validity, and it provides a useful basis for future iterations regarding improvements in our views of validity in the human sciences.
机译:总之,重要的是要考虑牛顿(本期)是否已经实现了他的两个目标。我们的观点是,他澄清了有效性的概念。从基于认知迭代的测量进展的角度来看,他提供了一个共识定义的有用快照,可以为下一次迭代奠定基础。牛顿对有效性的概念如何随时间变化进行了有益的描述,他的观点势必会引起对人类科学测量基础理论之一的更多辩论和讨论。牛顿的研究在强调有效性定义的历史变化方面起着重要作用,并且为未来迭代的改进提供了有用的基础,以改进我们在人类科学中对有效性的看法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2012年第4期|55-58|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Educational Studies, Emory University, 1784 North Decatur Building, Suite 240, Atlanta, GA 30322;

    Division of Educational Studies Emory University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:29:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号