首页> 外文期刊>Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science >Physical Education Teacher Attitudes toward Fitness Tests Scale: Cross-Revalidation and Modification
【24h】

Physical Education Teacher Attitudes toward Fitness Tests Scale: Cross-Revalidation and Modification

机译:体育教师对体能测验的态度量表:交叉验证和修正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to provide further evidence of validity and reliability for the Physical Education Teacher Attitudes toward Fitness Tests Scale (PETAFTS), which consisted of affective and cognitive domains. There were two subdomains in the affective domain (i.e., enjoyment of implementing fitness tests and enjoyment of using test results) and one domain in the cognitive domain (i.e., beliefs in the usefulness of test results). Full-time physical education teachers (N = 469) from two southwestern states in the United States participated in the study. Reliability and validity of the scale were examined. Alphas were computed for the entire 16-item scale, the affective and cognitive domains, and the two subdomains, respectively, to test the reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to investigate the construct validity. The commonly used CFA indices, such as the chi square (χ2), the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), the goodness of fit index (GFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), were used to assess the fit of the data to the model. The CFA results suggested that the data from the study did not fit the original model proposed by Keating and Silverman (2004b), resulting in the elimination of item 3. The fitness of the data to the model was improved and deemed acceptable. More studies on the reliability and validity of the scale are needed in the future in order to use the scale with more confidence.
机译:这项研究旨在为体育教师对体格测验量表(PETAFTS)的有效性和可靠性提供进一步的证据,该量表由情感和认知领域组成。在情感领域中有两个子域(即享受适应性测试和使用测试结果的乐趣),在认知领域中有一个子域(即对测试结果的有用性的信念)。来自美国西南两个州的专职体育教师(N = 469)参加了这项研究。检查量表的信度和效度。分别针对整个16项量表,情感和认知域以及两个子域分别计算Alpha,以测试可靠性。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于研究构建体的有效性。常用的CFA指数,例如卡方(χ2),比较拟合指数(CFI),塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI),拟合优度(GFI)和近似均方根误差( RMSEA)用于评估数据与模型的拟合度。 CFA结果表明,该研究的数据与Keating和Silverman(2004b)提出的原始模型不符,从而消除了第3项。数据对模型的适应性得到了改善,被认为是可以接受的。为了更自信地使用秤,将来需要对秤的可靠性和有效性进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号