首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia Mathematica >A Cause for Concern: Standard Abstracta and Causation
【24h】

A Cause for Concern: Standard Abstracta and Causation

机译:引起关注的原因:标准摘要和因果关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Benjamin Callard has recently suggested that causation between Platonic objects—standardly understood as atemporal and non-spatial—and spatio-temporal objects is not ‘a priori’ unintelligible. He considers the reasons some have given for its purported unintelligibility: apparent impossibility of energy transference, absence of physical contact, etc. He suggests that these considerations fail to rule out a priori Platonic-object causation. However, he has overlooked one important issue. Platonic objects must causally affect different objects differently, and different Platonic objects must causally affect the same objects differently. How are Platonic objects—ones outside space and time—supposed to do that?
机译:本杰明·卡拉德(Benjamin Callard)最近建议,柏拉图物体(通常被理解为非时空和非空间物体)与时空物体之间的因果关系并不是“先验”的。他考虑了某些人认为其难以理解的原因:能量转移的明显不可能,没有物理接触等。他建议这些考虑因素不能排除先验的柏拉图客体因果关系。但是,他忽略了一个重要问题。柏拉图物体必须因果关系不同地影响,而不同柏拉图物体必须因果关系相同地影响。柏拉图物体(在空间和时间之外的物体)应该如何做到这一点?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Philosophia Mathematica》 |2008年第3期|p.397-401|共5页
  • 作者

    Jody Azzouni*;

  • 作者单位

    *Department of Philosophy, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. 02155-7068 U.S.A. jodyazzouni{at}mindspring.com;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:06:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号