首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Return on Roller Coasters: A Model to Guide Investments in Theme Park Attractions
【24h】

Return on Roller Coasters: A Model to Guide Investments in Theme Park Attractions

机译:过山车收益率:指导主题公园景点投资的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the economic significance of the theme park industry and the huge investments needed to set up new attractions, no marketing models exist to guide these investment decisions. This study addresses this gap in the literature by estimating a response model for theme park attendance. The model not only determines the contribution of each attraction to attendance, but also how this contribution is distributed within and across years. The model accommodates saturation effects, which imply that the impact of a new attraction is smaller if similar attractions are already present. It also captures reinforcement effects, meaning that a new attraction may reinforce the drawing power of similar extant attractions, especially when these were introduced recently. The model is calibrated on 25 years of weekly attendance data from the Efteling, a leading European theme park. Our return on investment calculations show that it is more profitable to invest in multiple smaller attractions than in one big one. This finding is in remarkable contrast with the current "arms race" in the industry. Furthermore, even though thrill rides tend to be more effective than theme rides, there are conditions under which one should consider to switch to the latter.
机译:尽管主题公园行业具有重要的经济意义,并且需要大量投资来建立新的景点,但尚无营销模式可指导这些投资决策。这项研究通过估计主题公园游客的反应模型来弥补文献中的这一空白。该模型不仅确定了每个吸引力对出勤的贡献,而且还决定了该贡献在几年内以及跨年的分配方式。该模型具有饱和效果,这意味着如果已经存在类似的吸引力,则新吸引力的影响会较小。它还捕获了增强效果,这意味着新的吸引力可能会增强类似现存吸引力的吸引力,尤其是在最近引入这些吸引力时。该模型是根据来自欧洲领先主题公园Efteling的25年每周出勤数据进行校准的。我们的投资回报率计算表明,与多个大型景点相比,投资多个较小的景点更有利可图。这一发现与当前行业中的“军备竞赛”形成鲜明对比。此外,尽管刺激性骑行往往比主题骑行更为有效,但在某些情况下,应考虑改用后者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号